Why is my teacher calling 2m+(50s)(0.5m/s) pure piffle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression 2m + (50s)(0.5m/s) simplifies to 27m, which is mathematically valid. The confusion arises from the incorrect interpretation of units, specifically the cancellation of seconds in the term (50s)(0.5m/s), resulting in 25m. The teacher's dismissal of the calculation as "pure piffle" is based on a misunderstanding of dimensional analysis and unit consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic manipulation
  • Familiarity with units of measurement and dimensional analysis
  • Knowledge of how to perform unit cancellation in physics equations
  • Basic concepts of speed and distance relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study dimensional analysis in physics to ensure unit consistency
  • Learn about algebraic expressions involving units
  • Explore examples of speed, distance, and time calculations
  • Review common misconceptions in physics related to unit conversions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or mathematics, educators seeking to clarify unit analysis, and anyone interested in improving their understanding of algebraic expressions involving physical quantities.

thereidisanceman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
2m+(50s)(0.5m/s)
=
2m + 25m/{s}^{2}
=
Not possible

My teacher keeps saying this is pure piffle and shaking his head. Can someone please explain this to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have:

$$2\text{ m}+\left(50\text{ s}\right)\left(0.5\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\right)=$$

$$2\text{ m}+25\left(\cancel{\text{s}}\cdot\frac{\text{m}}{\cancel{\text{s}}}\right)=$$

$$(2+25)\text{ m}=27\text{ m}$$
 
oh... haha thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K