MHB Why is my teacher calling 2m+(50s)(0.5m/s) pure piffle?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the expression 2m + (50s)(0.5m/s). The initial confusion stems from the incorrect interpretation of units, leading to the claim that the result is "pure piffle." The correct calculation shows that 2m + 25m equals 27m, which is a valid result. The misunderstanding highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics equations. Ultimately, the clarification resolves the confusion regarding the teacher's dismissal of the expression.
thereidisanceman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
2m+(50s)(0.5m/s)
=
2m + 25m/{s}^{2}
=
Not possible

My teacher keeps saying this is pure piffle and shaking his head. Can someone please explain this to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have:

$$2\text{ m}+\left(50\text{ s}\right)\left(0.5\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\right)=$$

$$2\text{ m}+25\left(\cancel{\text{s}}\cdot\frac{\text{m}}{\cancel{\text{s}}}\right)=$$

$$(2+25)\text{ m}=27\text{ m}$$
 
oh... haha thank you!
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K