Why is the conservation of information not taught alongside cons of energy

AI Thread Summary
The concept of conservation of information is inadequately described online, with Leonard Susskind providing one of the few clear explanations related to the Hawking paradox. The lack of emphasis on this principle in education may stem from its appropriation by the Intelligent Design community, which has altered its perception. This appropriation raises concerns about the scientific validity of the term and its implications. The discussion highlights a need for clearer communication and teaching of the conservation of information in scientific contexts. Understanding this principle is crucial for a comprehensive grasp of energy conservation and related scientific laws.
adrianopolis
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
There seems to be a not very solid description of the concept of conservation of information on the Internet. Leonard suskind described the idea very well on discos program on the hawking paradox but this is the only place I have seen it described well. Any thoughts why cons of information isn't considered an important law to teach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proobably because the term "conservation of information" has been hijacked by the Intelligent Design community.
 
AlephZero said:
Proobably because the term "conservation of information" has been hijacked by the Intelligent Design community.

How. What do they use the term for?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top