Why Is the Derivative of the Function Set as a Constant in Classical Dynamics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter romsofia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the justification of a specific step in the derivation of an equation related to the path of a particle in a constant force field, as presented in a classical mechanics textbook. Participants explore the implications of setting the derivative of a function as a constant within the context of the Euler-Lagrange equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines a derivation involving a particle in a constant force field, leading to the use of the Euler-Lagrange equation.
  • The participant expresses uncertainty about justifying the step where the derivative of a function is set as a constant, questioning its basis beyond mere convenience.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the meaning of "a" in the context of the discussion.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates that "a" is simply a new constant and suggests that it is a convenient notation that can later be defined in terms of physical variables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the justification for setting the derivative as a constant, and there are multiple interpretations regarding the meaning of "a". The discussion remains unresolved regarding the justification of this step in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption that the constant derived in the Euler-Lagrange equation can be defined in terms of physical variables, but this connection is not explicitly established in the discussion.

romsofia
Gold Member
Messages
600
Reaction score
330
Hey, I am going to be a TA for an upper division classical mechanics class, and I'm going through the book, and making sure I can derive, or be able to justify equations used in the book. So far it has been okay, but one equation I can't justify. I will post the derivation here (or for those who have it, page 212 in Classical Dynamics by Thornton/Marion).The problem I'm sure we are all familiar with is given a particle in a constant force field, we need to find the path that the particle can take in the least amount of time.

So, let's begin: We assume our particle starts at rest at the origin ##x_1, y_1 ## and goes to some point ## x_2, y_2 ## We ignore friction in this problem, so our field in conservative thus T+U= Constant. We start measuring the particle at ## x = 0, U(0) = 0 ## and with the particle starting at rest, ## T+U = 0## which implies that ## T = - U ## thus, ##\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = mgx ##. This tells us that ## v = \sqrt{2gx} ##. So now let us set up our integral. We will see that ## t = \int^{x_2,y_2}_{x_1,y_2} \frac{ds}{v} ## where ds is the arc length, and v is the velocity. If we expand ds and substitute our velocity, we see the integral becomes: ## t = \int^{x_2,y_2}_{x_1,y_2} \frac{\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}}{\sqrt{2gx}} ##. Now let us multiply the numerator by ## \frac{dx}{dx} ## to see it become ##\sqrt{(dx^2+dy^2)\frac{dx^2}{dx^2}} \rightarrow \sqrt{dx^2*\frac{dx^2}{dx^2}+dy^2*\frac{dx^2}{dx^2}} \rightarrow \sqrt{dx^2(1+y'^2)} \rightarrow dx* \sqrt{(1+y'^2)} ## (If anyone has an alternate way to justify this step, I'd appreciate it).So now our integral is: ## \int^{x_2}_{0} \frac{\sqrt{(1+y'^2)}}{\sqrt{2gx}} dx \rightarrow \int^{x_2}_{0} \sqrt{\frac{1+y'^2}{2gx}} dx ##Great, so we want a minimum for our time, and we can say our function is : ## \sqrt{\frac{1+y'^2}{x}} ## So let's use our euler lagrange equation. ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 0 ## because our function doesn't depend of y, so we're left with ## \frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} = 0 ##. Since the derivative of a constant is equal to 0, we can say that ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} = CONSTANT ##. Now this is the step I can't justify very well, the book just says that ## \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} = CONSTANT = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2a}} ## which is out of the blue, and would seem like magic to most students, which I don't like. Is there anyway to justify this other than it helps us finish the problem? I don't think any student would have any a priori reason to make the constant equal to this. Maybe I'm over looking something??Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
What is "a" equal to?
a is just a "new constant" in their words.
 
romsofia said:
a is just a "new constant" in their words.

Then the 1 over square root of a constant is a convenient way to note the generic constant. It is convenient because one can later give "a" a meaning in terms of physical variables.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K