Why is the energy not conserved when adding waves?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Waves
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 2K views
Daker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

There is something wrong with this logic. Anyone see the flaw.

If we have a wave in y traveling along the z axis y= y_0cos(kz-wt) then the energy it carries is proportional to y_0^2. If we superimpose a second wave with the same amplitude (and so the same energy) and in phase with the first wave then we add the amplitudes to get a wave described by y= 2y0cos(kz-wt). The energy in this wave is proportional to the amplitude squared i.e. 4y_0^2. But energy is not conserved between the two initial waves and the resultant wave i.e y_0^2+y_0^2 \ne 4y_0^2.

Similarly if the waves are pi out of phase the resultant is zero and in this case y_0^2+y_0^2 = 0!

Sorry for being dumb!

Daker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the reason is, that even though you can superposition waves, you can't simply add the enrgies - for the exact reason you mentioned.
We have the same problem with EM-fields, since the energy here is also proportional to E or B squared.
I think you just have to re-calculate the energy/intensity.
 
You need to include the work done by whatever is creating the waves.

If a single plane wave is transmitting power P, then whatever creates the wave also requires power P.

But if you then put a second "identical" wave generator in the path of the first wave, in general it requires a different amount of power to operate it, because it is also interacting with the first wave. The power required depends on the phase angle between the force and the motion of the wave.
 
Thank you AlephZero and jeppetrost for these comments - very helpful.