Why is the energy not conserved when adding waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in wave superposition, highlighting a flaw in the assumption that the energies of two in-phase waves can simply be added. When two waves with the same amplitude are superimposed, the resultant wave's energy is proportional to the square of the combined amplitude, leading to a discrepancy in energy conservation. The conversation also touches on electromagnetic fields, emphasizing that energy calculations must consider the work done by the wave generators. Additionally, the interaction between wave generators can alter the power required to maintain the waves, depending on their phase relationship. Overall, the key takeaway is that energy in wave interactions must be recalculated rather than assumed to be additive.
Daker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

There is something wrong with this logic. Anyone see the flaw.

If we have a wave in y traveling along the z axis y= y_0cos(kz-wt) then the energy it carries is proportional to y_0^2. If we superimpose a second wave with the same amplitude (and so the same energy) and in phase with the first wave then we add the amplitudes to get a wave described by y= 2y0cos(kz-wt). The energy in this wave is proportional to the amplitude squared i.e. 4y_0^2. But energy is not conserved between the two initial waves and the resultant wave i.e y_0^2+y_0^2 \ne 4y_0^2.

Similarly if the waves are pi out of phase the resultant is zero and in this case y_0^2+y_0^2 = 0!

Sorry for being dumb!

Daker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the reason is, that even though you can superposition waves, you can't simply add the enrgies - for the exact reason you mentioned.
We have the same problem with EM-fields, since the energy here is also proportional to E or B squared.
I think you just have to re-calculate the energy/intensity.
 
You need to include the work done by whatever is creating the waves.

If a single plane wave is transmitting power P, then whatever creates the wave also requires power P.

But if you then put a second "identical" wave generator in the path of the first wave, in general it requires a different amount of power to operate it, because it is also interacting with the first wave. The power required depends on the phase angle between the force and the motion of the wave.
 
Thank you AlephZero and jeppetrost for these comments - very helpful.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top