Why is the Force on the Wire Directed from Stronger to Weaker Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Force Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of the force on a wire in a magnetic field, which is directed from a stronger to a weaker field, contrary to initial assumptions. The force arises from the interaction between the magnetic field of the magnet and the magnetic field generated by the current in the wire. Newton's third law is also addressed, clarifying that while the wire experiences a force due to the magnet, it simultaneously exerts an equal and opposite force on the magnet itself. The energy dynamics of the magnetic fields explain why the force moves towards the weaker field, as this movement reduces energy more significantly in the stronger field. The interaction is complex, involving current density and magnetic dipole density, but fundamentally illustrates the principles of electromagnetism at play.
songoku
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
386
1602850831859.png


I understand how the weaker and stronger field occurs but I don't understand why the force on the wire is directed from stronger to weaker field. I mean why not from weaker to stronger?

I also want to ask about Newton's 3rd law in this case. Newton's 3rd law states that for every action there will be equal and opposite reaction. So let say the force on wire in the picture as "action", what will be the "reaction"? The force on the wire is due to the (unbalanced) field so the "reaction" will be the force on (unbalanced) field by the wire?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on the wire is due to the current running through it. If you make the field of the magnet ##\vec{B}=B \vec{e}_x## then ##\vec{j}=-j \vec{e}_z## and the force per unit volume of the wire is ##\vec{f}=\vec{j} \times \vec{B}=-j B \vec{e}_y##. I don't know, what this has to do with an "unbalanced field" (whatever this might be).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku and etotheipi
I am really sorry, I don't understand the notation used.

vanhees71 said:
The force on the wire is due to the current running through it. If you make the field of the magnet ##\vec{B}=B \vec{e}_x## then ##\vec{j}=-j \vec{e}_z##

Do you mean ##\vec{B}## is the magnetic field of the magnet (which is to the right based on the picture)?

And what is ##\vec{j}## ?

I don't know, what this has to do with an "unbalanced field" (whatever this might be).
By unbalanced field, I mean there is stronger and weaker region of magnetic field (in picture (b)).

I was taught that the magnetic force occurs due to interaction between 2 magnetic fields, one is from the magnet and one is produced by the current flowing through the wire. This interaction will create unbalanced field, one region is stronger (upper part of wire in picture (b) ) and one region is weaker (lower part of wire in picture (b) ). This stronger and weaker field will give rise to magnetic force acting on the wire, which is directed from stronger field to weaker field (downwards based on picture (b) )

Thanks
 
Two magnetic fields do not interact (in classical electrodynamics). The total field is just the sum of the fields of the permanent magnet (which I assumed to be approximately constant as given in the picture) and the field due to the current through the wire, and ##\vec{j}## is the current density in the wire. The total force is
$$\vec{F}=V \vec{f}=-A l j B \vec{e}_y=-l I B \vec{e}_y,$$
where ##l## is the length of the wire and ##A## its cross-sectional area.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and etotheipi
songoku said:
I also want to ask about Newton's 3rd law in this case. Newton's 3rd law states that for every action there will be equal and opposite reaction. So let say the force on wire in the picture as "action", what will be the "reaction"?

The wire also exerts a force on the magnet!
 
  • Like
Likes songoku, berkeman and vanhees71
songoku said:
I understand how the weaker and stronger field occurs but I don't understand why the force on the wire is directed from stronger to weaker field. I mean why not from weaker to stronger?
You can think of this in terms of energy. The energy in the field is proportional to the square of the B field. If the wire moves in the direction of the weaker field then that will increase the weak field and decrease the strong field. Because the energy is proportional to the square of the field the energy reduction of the strong field will be larger than the energy increase of the weak field. This implies a force in that direction which can be used to do work equal to the net reduction in energy.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and vanhees71
etotheipi said:
The wire also exerts a force on the magnet!
Let say the force on the wire is F, so there will be upwards force of magnitude F on right magnet and there will also be upwards force of magnitude F on left magnet?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Let say the force on the wire is F, so there will be upwards force of magnitude F on right magnet and there will also be upwards force of magnitude F on left magnet?
If there were then you would have a reactionless drive. So no.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
Dale said:
If there were then you would have a reactionless drive. So no.
Or maybe the force on left and right magnet should be F/2 upwards for each?

Thanks
 
  • #10
Of course, there's a force on the magnet by the wire. You can calculate it in the same way as for the force on the wire by the magnet. It's only not so straight forward, because you don't have an obvious current density here, because it's a permanent magnet.

For this you can show that the force is given by
$$\vec{F}_{\text{mag}}=\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 x \vec{\nabla} (\vec{M} \cdot \vec{B}_{\text{wire}}),$$
where the integral is over the volume of the magnet and ##\vec{M}## is the magnetic-dipole density within the magnet.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and etotheipi
  • #11
Thank you very much vanhees71, etotheipi, Dale
 
Back
Top