Why Is the Integral Result 175/3 Instead of 45?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homeworkhelpls
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Curve
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function (1/3)x^3 + 2x evaluated from the lower limit of 2 to the upper limit of 5 results in 45, not 175/3. The discrepancy arises when the lower limit is incorrectly set to -2, which would yield 175/3. This indicates a potential error in the problem statement or a calculation mistake. Additionally, proper notation is crucial; writing (1/3)x^3 clarifies that x^3 is in the numerator, preventing misinterpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions
  • Knowledge of proper mathematical notation
  • Experience with computational tools like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the fundamentals of definite integrals in calculus
  • Practice integrating polynomial functions
  • Learn about common notation pitfalls in mathematical expressions
  • Explore the use of Wolfram Alpha for verifying integral calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone interested in verifying integral calculations accurately.

homeworkhelpls
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
1675365471735.png

i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
homeworkhelpls said:
View attachment 321610
i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
Both Wolfram Alpha and I agree with you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: homeworkhelpls and topsquark
Me too!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: homeworkhelpls
The integral would evaluate to 175/3 if the lower limit were x=-2. I suspect a silly typo or calculation slip by the question setter.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: homeworkhelpls and PeroK
homeworkhelpls said:
View attachment 321610
i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
Just a notation tip. 1/3x^3 can be misread as 1/(3x^3) placing the x^3 in the denominator. To be precise, we can instead write (1/3)x^3 to ensure x^3 is in the numerator and not mistakenly placed in the denominator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K