MHB Why is the integration result not -xe^-x - e^-x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cadbury
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Cadbury
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
View attachment 3778

So v' is the one to be integrated and v is the answer,
why is it not -xe^-x - e^-x ? :confused:

Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • a.png
    a.png
    970 bytes · Views: 100
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Cadbury. What is the result of $$\int x e^{-x} \, dx?$$
 
Fantini said:
Hello Cadbury. What is the result of $$\int x e^{-x} \, dx?$$

Oh, I get it now haha, first I have to use integration by parts where u= x, dv= e^ -x then uv - integral(vdu) then after

-xe^-x +e^-x - e^-x = -xe^-x hehe
 
It's even easier if you write the first DE as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y' = \left( x - 1 \right) \, \mathrm{e}^{-x} \end{align*}$, you can still apply integration by parts and this time you don't have to do two separate integrals...
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top