Why is the opamp output a voltage?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the output of operational amplifiers (op-amps), specifically why it is considered a voltage output. Participants explore the relationship between current and voltage in circuits involving op-amps and transistors, addressing concepts of feedback, output resistance, and the implications of load resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the output voltage of an op-amp is due to the feedback circuit adjusting the output based on the input voltage.
  • Others argue that the output of a transistor in a common emitter configuration does not behave like an ideal voltage source, as adding a load resistor affects the output voltage.
  • A participant mentions that the output current from a transistor develops a voltage across a resistor, but this does not imply the output acts as a voltage source.
  • Some participants propose that the feedback circuit in an op-amp reduces output resistance, allowing it to be treated as a voltage source under certain conditions.
  • There is mention of operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs) having high impedance current outputs, which contrasts with traditional op-amps.
  • A participant highlights that the gain of an op-amp is defined as output voltage per input voltage, suggesting that feedback is essential for achieving desired gain values.
  • Confusion arises regarding the nature of output impedance and how it relates to the classification of the output as a voltage source.
  • Some participants note that the open-loop gain of an op-amp is high and that feedback is used to achieve linear characteristics, but opinions differ on whether this gain is considered "unwanted."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express conflicting views on whether the output of an op-amp can be classified strictly as a voltage source. While some agree that feedback plays a crucial role in defining the output characteristics, others maintain that the output behavior can vary significantly depending on circuit conditions and configurations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions and behaviors of voltage and current sources can depend on specific circuit configurations and operating conditions. The discussion involves assumptions about ideal versus non-ideal components and the effects of feedback on output characteristics.

  • #31
Rive said:
Hopeless academic overthinking on a clearly defined topic what's completely missing the very point at the end.

The OP stated a narrow focus question, and it was widened to a such useless scope that at the end it cannot be answered clearly - and it is still progressing further.
Yes, you have a point but it is also important to keep things clear and to avoid generalisations. You must be aware of the problems about using dB Gain figures that come about when people aren't aware of the pitfalls.
"Are those Voltage dBs or Power dBs?" is so often asked and that's why I am being picky. That's not "academic overthinking", it's avoiding elementary mistakes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Rive said:
Hopeless academic overthinking on a clearly defined topic what's completely missing the very point at the end.
The OP stated a narrow focus question, and it was widened to a such useless scope that at the end it cannot be answered clearly - and it is still progressing further.
I agree with you.
Besides the fact that the OP has selected a wrong title, everythig he has stated was correct.
However, he did not explain the source of his his confusion. May be that`s the reason for the various answers.
 
  • #33
LvW said:
Besides the fact that the OP has selected a wrong title
I think he choose the correct title, with a terrible example. For OpAmps the output stage defines only the operation limits/area: within those limits the output can be determined through the feedback. Any usage when the output (or something else) is a limiting factor instead of the feedback can be considered as faulty.
Since he did not know this, he thought that the answer will be related to the output circuitry. The answers followed this path and the topic started to diverge from the title and kept on giving more and more generalised answers, based on the commonly used output stages (and non-opamp related definitions).

That's how I see it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #34
This is the most typical op-amp, according to Wikipedia:
750px-OpAmpTransistorLevel_Colored_Labeled.svg.png

We see the input voltage difference converted into proportional current that is charging the 30 pF capacitor. The capacitor voltage is added to the (Q15 base potential which is almost the) "Vs-" potential and the result is applied to the input of the output voltage follower thus defining the output potential.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #35
AlexCaledin said:
charging the 30 pF capacitor.
It's not really "charging" that capacitor. That is likely the "dominant pole" setting capacitor for the opamp, which is needed for stability when the opamp is used in feedback configurations.

http://m.eet.com/media/1126333/266795-6666155_fig2.gif
266795-6666155_fig2.gif
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexCaledin
  • #36
berkeman said:
It's not really "charging" that capacitor. That is likely the "dominant pole" . . .

- well, at least, when that pole is actually dominant - that is, when the Phase is approximately 90 degrees - the amplifier works practically according to "charging" the capacitor with high frequency (from several kHz to several MHz) current. Of course, at low frequencies a 30 pF capacitor can hardly define anything and the output is more like current (amplified by Q15, Q19 and Q14/Q20).
 
Last edited:
  • #37
AlexCaledin said:
well, at least, when that pole is actually dominant
Sorry, I'm not following. Do you routinely add a different dominant pole in your feedback opamp circuits? If you do, how do you manage to maintain a reasonable phase margin and ensure stability?

EDIT/ADD -- And can you list an opamp part number where you actually are required to add your own dominant pole to keep your feedback circuit stable? :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #38
berkeman said:
EDIT/ADD -- And can you list an opamp part number where you actually are required to add your own dominant pole to keep your feedback circuit stable? :smile:
LM108
http://www.mit.edu/~6.301/LM108.pdf
 
  • #39
berkeman said:
Do you routinely add a different dominant pole in your feedback opamp circuits?

- sorry! What I tried to say was simply "when the process of amplification - not only stability - is actually determined by that pole", that is, when the frequency of the amplified signal is such as to make the open-loop phase shift be about 90 degrees.

No, I routinely choose opamps that are stable with simplest feedbacks. (I am thinking how to eliminate the crossover distortion in an audio amplifier, using actually two quite simple amplifiers working together, one of them forcing another, via a little transformer, to have non-distorted output current - it seems very promising when simulated. To find the principles of connecting two systems together, I have to keep each of them simple.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K