Why is the Poynting Vector defined as E x B?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Usaf Moji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poynting vector Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Poynting Vector, defined as S = 1/u(E x B), indicates the direction of electromagnetic (EM) wave propagation, with E representing the electric field and B the magnetic field. The orientation of E and B fields is determined by Maxwell's equations, which dictate that for a wave traveling in the z-direction, the components Ez and Bz must equal zero to satisfy the divergence conditions. The relationship between E and B fields is not arbitrary; it is a necessary mathematical consequence of the wave equations derived from Maxwell's equations in a vacuum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic wave theory
  • Knowledge of vector calculus
  • Basic principles of wave propagation in a vacuum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poynting Vector from Maxwell's equations
  • Explore the implications of divergence conditions in electromagnetic fields
  • Learn about the wave equation in the context of electromagnetic waves
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of cross products in vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of electromagnetic wave behavior and the mathematical foundations of the Poynting Vector.

Usaf Moji
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Poynting Vector is by definition:

S = 1/u(E x B), where S points in the direction of the EM wave's motion.

In other words, for an EM wave moving from left to right, the electric field component always points up as the magnetic field component hits us in the face, and conversely, the electric field component always points down as the magnetic field components moves away from us into the page.

My question is, how was this constant relative position of the B field to the E field determined, i.e. was it experimentally determined, or is it a necessary mathematical consequence of other formulae? In other words, why is it E x B instead of B x E? Is this just the way EM fields are measured to be, or is their some logical/mathematical reason for it?

All responses appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We know from Maxwell's equations in vacuum that the Laplacian(E) = UoEo*(d^2E/dt^2) and similarly for Laplacian(B) = UoEod^2B/dt.

These satisfy the wave equation. However, Maxwell's equations add constraints to the waves.

For instance, a wave traveling in the z driection Ez and Bz must equal zero to satisfy div(E) = div(B) = 0. (Waves are in a vacuum so div(E) = 0).

Also del X E also tells us that Bo = k/w(z X Eo) which is the relation you were discussing.
 
Oh and sorry about the messy notation, I don't know LaTex.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K