Why is the right side of the equation incorrect in 3^(2x) = 18x?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation 3^(2x) = 18x, with participants questioning the correctness of the right side of the equation and exploring methods to solve it. The scope includes algebraic manipulation, numerical techniques, and properties of exponential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the equation might be incorrectly stated and propose that it should be 3^(2x) = 18^x instead.
  • Others argue that the equation cannot be solved algebraically and propose using numeric root-finding techniques.
  • A few participants present methods involving logarithms to solve the equation, indicating that once in the form 2^x = 1, one can conclude x = 0.
  • Some participants emphasize that it is not always necessary to use logarithms for exponential equations, noting that if a^b = a^c, then b = c.
  • There is a repeated assertion that any non-zero value raised to the power of zero equals one, reinforcing the conclusion that x = 0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the conclusion that x = 0, but there is disagreement regarding the initial formulation of the equation and the methods used to arrive at that conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the algebraic solvability of the original equation and the implications of using different forms of the equation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in algebraic manipulation of exponential equations, numerical methods for solving equations, and properties of exponents may find this discussion relevant.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Can this be a mistake?

Find x.

3^(2x) = 18x

Shouldn't the right side be 18^(x)?

If so, I can then take the log on both sides.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, the equation as given cannot be solved algebraically. A numeric root-finding technique could be used though. If we take the equation to be:

$$3^{2x}=18^x$$

Then we could write this as:

$$3^{2x}-2^x\cdot3^{2x}=0$$

Divide through by $3^{2x}$ since it cannot be zero for real values of $x$:

$$1-2^x=0\implies x=0$$

You could also use logs, but I just wanted to present an alternate method. :D
 
Is this not an exponential equation?
 
RTCNTC said:
Is this not an exponential equation?

Yes, but it's not always necessary to use logs to solve them. If we can arrange such an equation in the form:

$$a^b=a^c$$ where $a$ is neither 0 nor 1, then we know:

$$b=c$$

In this problem, we found:

$$2^x=1=2^0$$

Therefore we conclude:

$$x=0$$
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, the equation as given cannot be solved algebraically. A numeric root-finding technique could be used though. If we take the equation to be:

$$3^{2x}=18^x$$

Then we could write this as:

$$3^{2x}-2^x\cdot3^{2x}=0$$

Divide through by $3^{2x}$ since it cannot be zero for real values of $x$:

$$1-2^x=0\implies x=0$$

You could also use logs, but I just wanted to present an alternate method. :D

3^2x = 18^x

3^2x - 2^x • 3^2x = 0

You said "Divide through by 3^2x..."

We are left with 1 - 2^x = 0.

1 = 2^x

ln(1) = ln[2^(x)]

0 = xln2

0/ln2 = x

0 = x
 
Once you reach the point:

$$2^x=1$$

Instead of taking the natural log of both sides (which is completely valid), you could also translate directly from exponential to logarithmic notation, and write:

$$x=\log_2(1)=0$$ :D
 
MarkFL said:
Once you reach the point:

$$2^x=1$$

Instead of taking the natural log of both sides (which is completely valid), you could also translate directly from exponential to logarithmic notation, and write:

$$x=\log_2(1)=0$$ :D

We can also say, in terms of 2^x = 1, that anything to the zero power is 1.

So, 2^x = 1 means (number)^0 = 1.

We say x = 0.
 
RTCNTC said:
We can also say, in terms of 2^x = 1, that anything to the zero power is 1.

So, 2^x = 1 means (number)^0 = 1.

We say x = 0.

Yes, any non-zero value raised to the power of zero is 1, as evidenced by using a rule for exponents:

$$1=\frac{a^b}{a^b}=a^{b-b}=a^0$$
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, any non-zero value raised to the power of zero is 1, as evidenced by using a rule for exponents:

$$1=\frac{a^b}{a^b}=a^{b-b}=a^0$$

Very cool.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K