Why is the second approach incorrect? pulley problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a pulley problem involving two masses and the forces acting on them. Participants are analyzing two different methods for solving the problem and questioning the validity of the approaches taken, particularly focusing on the treatment of forces in different directions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correctness of method 1 and method 2, questioning how forces in different directions can be combined. There is a focus on the equations of motion for each mass and the implications of treating the system as a whole.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the errors in method 2, particularly regarding the treatment of forces and accelerations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply Newton's laws to the system, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the definitions of forces in the x and y directions and the implications of missing external forces in their equations. There is also mention of the need to consider the entire pulley system in their analysis.

EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



IMG_1895.jpg

Homework Equations


friction force = F_v
m=m1

The Attempt at a Solution



is method 1 correct? if so, why method 2 came out with a totally incorrect answer.
I understand that you can also set up acceleration equations for m1 and m2, since their acceleration are equal, and solve the system of equation. I am just curious if I can do it by force components. [/B]
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1895.jpg
    IMG_1895.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 878
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I actually have a question about your method 1. You are taking mg, which is in the y direction, and Fv, which is in the x direction, and just adding them as algebraic quantities. How are you able to do that? Does that not say that method 1 is wrong?
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
I actually have a question about your method 1. You are taking mg, which is in the y direction, and Fv, which is in the x direction, and just adding them as algebraic quantities. How are you able to do that? Does that not say that method 1 is wrong?
Yes,you can, because in the first method, I am treating the system as a whole(single object), so, only external forces matters.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
why method 2 came out with a totally incorrect answer.
First, you need to say exactly what you mean by Fx and Fy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
First, you need to say exactly what you mean by Fx and Fy.
Hello, I meant Fx as in sum of forces in x direction, Fy as sum of forces in y direction
 
EastWindBreaks said:
Hello, I meant Fx as in sum of forces in x direction, Fy as sum of forces in y direction
Sum of forces on what system?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
Sum of forces on what system?
on the entire pulley system
 
haruspex said:
Sum of forces on what system?
I guess Ft-Fv=(m1+m2)*a and m1g-Ft=(m1+m2)*a as well, equating them would be sufficient? since they have same acceleration.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
on the entire pulley system
Two masses plus string? ... plus pulley? ... plus bench?
Whichever you pick, you are missing some external forces in your equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
  • #10
Write Newton's second law separately for the masses. The hanging mass moves in the vertical (y) direction, with vertical acceleration a1, The sliding mass moves in the horizontal direction with horizontal acceleration a2. The tension in the rope is T, the same everywhere. So m1a1= m1g -T
m2a2 = T-fr.
As the length of the rope is constant, the magnitude of the accelerations are the same a1=a2=a. We can consider a as the acceleration along the rope, making the problem one-dimensional. Adding the equations above, the tension cancels, and you get the acceleration in terms of the external forces /gravity, friction) and the sum of the masses.
upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
    upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 384
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
  • #11
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
  • #12
Chandra Prayaga said:
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
wow, right on the point! that makes sense now. thank you!
 
  • #13
Chandra Prayaga said:
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
If all the external forces are added vectorially, and the sum is divided by the whole mass, it gives the acceleration of the center of mass. Among the external force is also the force the pulley acts on the system of two masses connected by the rope.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K