AgentPancake
- 9
- 0
why isn't it like infinity or something.
The discussion revolves around the nature of the speed of light, specifically why it is a finite constant rather than infinite. Participants explore the implications of this within the framework of physics, particularly in relation to the principles of relativity and mathematical constants.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the speed of light and its implications. While some points are clarified, there is no consensus on the underlying reasons for the speed of light being finite versus infinite.
The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of mathematical and physical constants, as well as the implications of relativity, which may not be universally agreed upon or fully explored.
As I said in your other thread, the fact that the maximum speed, which coincides with the speed of light in vacuum, is a finite constant follows from the special principle of relativity, i.e. that there is no preferred frame of reference.AgentPancake said:why isn't it like infinity or something.
AgentPancake said:hmmm, its like something made the laws of pi and the speed of light etc