Why is the thick disc hard to study?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flucky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Hard Study
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of studying the thick disc of the Milky Way galaxy, particularly in relation to the thin disc and the density of stars and interstellar material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the idea that light from the thin disc may interfere with observations of the thick disc. Questions arise about the differences between the thick and thin discs and the implications of density on visibility.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the density of stars and gas in the galaxy's core, suggesting that this density complicates observations. There appears to be a productive discussion regarding the assumptions about visibility and the factors affecting the study of the thick disc.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of looking through varying densities of stars and interstellar material, as well as the specific challenges posed by the galaxy's structure. There is an ongoing exploration of how these factors influence observational difficulties.

Flucky
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

As said in the title, why is the thick disc of our galaxy hard to study?


The attempt at a solution

I thought at first it may have something to do with the fact that the thin disc is so populated with stars that the light coming from it may interfere when trying to look at the thick disc just past it (like when it's dark and you try to look out of a window when the lights are on). If that was the case though it would be the same when trying to look at anything past the thin disc so it couldn't be right. Does anybody have any ideas?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumpetty bump
 
What's the difference between thick and thin discs?
 
Flucky said:
If that was the case though it would be the same when trying to look at anything past the thin disc so it couldn't be right.
What makes you think that's not right?
 
DaveC426913 said:
What makes you think that's not right?

I just thought if that was the case it would be equally hard to study anything beyond the thin disc, including the Milky Way's halo, distant galaxies, deep space etc.
 
Flucky said:
I just thought if that was the case it would be equally hard to study anything beyond the thin disc, including the Milky Way's halo, distant galaxies, deep space etc.
When we are looking at the bulk of our own galaxy's core, we are looking through the densest parts of the disk. ie. tens of thousands of light years of stars and gas and dust.

Anywhere else we look we are looking out through only a few thousands of light years, and the stars aren't very dense.
 
DaveC426913 said:
When we are looking at the bulk of our own galaxy's core, we are looking through the densest parts of the disk. ie. tens of thousands of light years of stars and gas and dust.

Anywhere else we look we are looking out through only a few thousands of light years, and the stars aren't very dense.

Ah I think it's clicked now, thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K