Why is the variance of the Parzen density estimator infinite?

crbazevedo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm new to this forum and I'm glad to have found such a high quality resource where we can have such valuable guidance and discussions.

I've read somewhere that the variance of p(x) = {\frac{1}{n}}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\delta(x-x_i) \forall x \in \Re[\tex], <br /> <br /> in which D_n = \left\{x_1, \cdots, x_n\right\}[\tex] independent realizations of a continuous random variable X[\tex], and \delta[\tex] is the dirac delta function, is infinite, irrespective to n[\tex] and D_n[\tex]. &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; My questions are straightforward: &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; 1) Why is that (my guess that the integral involved in the variance calculation does not converge)?; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; 2) What does it mean to have infinite variance in practical terms?; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; 3) Any practical examples where a distribution with infinite variance would be useful?; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Please note that I don&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t have a strong background in statistics.&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Any help will be much appreciated.&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Cheers,&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Carlos
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
crbazevedo said:
I've read somewhere that the variance of p(x) = {\frac{1}{n}}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\delta(x-x_i) \forall x \in \Re[\tex], <br /> <br /> in which D_n = \left\{x_1, \cdots, x_n\right\}[\tex] independent realizations of a continuous random variable X[\tex], and \delta[\tex] is the dirac delta function, is infinite, irrespective to n[\tex] and D_n[\tex]. &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Assuming you mean to find the variance of &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;i&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;the random variable with density&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/i&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; p(x), this would be infinite only if the variance of X is infinite (for example if X has the Cauchy or Pareto distribution).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top