Why Is There No Immunity After Parasitic Infection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
Immunity to parasitic infections differs significantly from immunity to bacteria and viruses, as parasites can be much larger and may have complex life cycles. The individual in question may not have developed immunity due to the presence of different subspecies of the parasite or the activation of a dormant stage of the parasite that was never fully cleared. Additionally, the term "allergy" used in the context of parasitic infections is misleading, as immune responses to parasites are not classified as allergies. There is evidence suggesting that prior infections may trigger autoimmune responses, which can mimic allergic reactions. Understanding these nuances is crucial for addressing the perplexing case of the individual's recurring infection.
Raghav Gupta
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
76

Homework Statement



An individual suffered from a severe bout of parasitic infection. He recovered from this illness using some medical help, however he is affected by the same allergy in the next season of infection. The doctors are perplexed and would like to understand why the person is unable to display any immunity to the parasite. What can be the possible cause for the condition displayed by the individual?

Homework Equations


Don't know.

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it the parasite has modified and macrophages are not able to detect this? But here in question it is mentioned that individual is affected by same allergy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be possible to get more details on the question?

With this I can only give a very general response: immunity to parasites is somewhat different from immunity responses to bacteria and/or viruses as parasites can be a great deal larger than the average white blood cell (think intestinal parasite such as worms which can grow to be meters in length) where as some parasites are small enough to exist within human cells. In general parasites don't mutate much - certainly not as much or as quickly as viruses do - so it's unlikely that a change in the parasite itself caused the patient trouble. But there are often many subspecies of a particular parasite which may led to re-infection with a different subtype. Additionally some parasites have latent stages in their lifecycle, where in a patient doesn't have any symptoms and may appear to be fine, until the parasite enters a new stage and becomes active once more. It might be that the initial infection was never fully cleared and the patient is suffering from activation of a dormant parasite.

Further more I'm a little confused by the term allergy in your question. Immunity responses to parasites are not called 'allergies' however there is some data on the fact that a prior parasitic infection might trigger an auto-immune response in humans, which can sometimes be confused with allergies?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top