Undergrad Why is this Isometry a rotation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doradus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isometry Rotation
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a given direct isometry, Φ, in Euclidean space R^3 is a rotation. Participants emphasize the need to show substantial work and suggest analyzing angles between vectors and considering the properties of rotation matrices, such as determinants. They also recommend defining key terms like "rotation" and "direct isometry" to clarify understanding. Additionally, the importance of calculating matrix properties related to rotations is highlighted. The conversation underscores the necessity of demonstrating effort in solving the problem to receive appropriate assistance.
Doradus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i need a little help. Did someone have an idea how to prove this?

Thanks in advance.

Be ##\Phi## an direct isometry of the euclidean Space ##\mathbb{R}^3## with

##\Phi (\begin{pmatrix} 2\\0 \\1 \end{pmatrix})##=##\begin{pmatrix} 2\\1 \\0 \end{pmatrix}## and ##\Phi (\begin{pmatrix} 1\\1 \\0 \end{pmatrix}) ##=## \frac{1}{3} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\4 \\1 \end{pmatrix}##

Why is ##\Phi## a rotation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doradus said:
Hello,

i need a little help. Did someone have an idea how to prove this?

Thanks in advance.

Be ##\Phi## an direct isometry of the euclidean Space ##\mathbb{R}^3## with

##\Phi (\begin{pmatrix} 2\\0 \\1 \end{pmatrix})##=##\begin{pmatrix} 2\\1 \\0 \end{pmatrix}## and ##\Phi (\begin{pmatrix} 1\\1 \\0 \end{pmatrix}) ##=## \frac{1}{3} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\4 \\1 \end{pmatrix}##

Why is ##\Phi## a rotation?
All schoolwork-type question should be posted in the Homework Help forums, and you need to show your efforts toward solving the question. Advanced schoolwork questions are sometimes allowed in the technical forums, but only if the poster shows substantial work.

Can you say what level class this is for, and please show your thoughts for how to proceed?
 
Is it? Have you calculated the angles between the vectors before and after? Or the matrix wrt the basis (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (0,0,1)?
 
It might also be a good idea to start with defining what you understand under "rotation" and "direct isometry".
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
you might ask yourself whether every linear isometry might actually be an isometry, and if not why not. If you know the basic theory there is only one number to compute, (and that only up to sign!).
 
Hey Doradus.

In addition to the above advice I'd write down the conditions for a rotation matrix.

Hint - Think about determinants and other matrix properties of rotation matrices.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K