Why is this way of computing imaginary arctangents wrong?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter David Carroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing Imaginary
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incorrect computation of the arctangent function for imaginary arguments, specifically arctan(i√2). The original poster mistakenly derived the equation arctan(x) = -x from a series of incorrect manipulations involving the identity x² = -2. Key errors identified include treating a conditional equation as an identity and misapplying the properties of derivatives. The correct understanding of arctan's behavior with complex numbers is essential for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex number theory
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Familiarity with the arctangent function and its properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the arctangent function for complex arguments
  • Learn about the derivation and application of complex derivatives
  • Explore the relationship between trigonometric functions and their inverses
  • Investigate common mistakes in manipulating identities and equations in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of trigonometric functions involving imaginary numbers will benefit from this discussion.

David Carroll
Messages
181
Reaction score
13
I was doing some things in my head the other day (these moments usually don't come out so well :rolleyes:). And I "came up" with the following way to compute the arctangent with imaginary arguments.

Consider the identity x2 = - 2, where x = ± i√2.

Now rearrange this identity to x2 + 1 = -1

Invert the equation to get the reciprocals 1/(x2 + 1) = - 1

Multiply both sides by arctan(x)

arctan(x)(1/(x2 + 1)) = - arctan(x)

Let y = arctan(x)

Then we have the differential equation yy' = - y (Because 1/(x^2 + 1) is the derivative of arctan(x))

Divide both sides by y to get y' = - 1

Now integrate both sides ∫dy = - ∫dx

The result is y = - x

But since y = arctan(x), it follows that arctan(x) = - x

And since we know that x = ± i√2, it follows that arctan(i√2) = - i√2 and arctan(-i√2) = i√2

I know I must have done something wrong here. Could someone please point out the errors (which I'm sure are many o0)) in the above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
David Carroll said:
I was doing some things in my head the other day (these moments usually don't come out so well :rolleyes:). And I "came up" with the following way to compute the arctangent with imaginary arguments.

Consider the identity x2 = - 2, where x = ± i√2.
The above is not an identity. It is a conditional equation that is true only for two values of x. Here are two examples of identities:
1. x2 + 2x + 1 = (x + 1)2
2. sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)
David Carroll said:
Now rearrange this identity to x2 + 1 = -1

Invert the equation to get the reciprocals 1/(x2 + 1) = - 1

Multiply both sides by arctan(x)

arctan(x)(1/(x2 + 1)) = - arctan(x)

Let y = arctan(x)

Then we have the differential equation yy' = - y (Because 1/(x^2 + 1) is the derivative of arctan(x))
arctan(x) is a constant, so its derivative is 0.
David Carroll said:
Divide both sides by y to get y' = - 1

Now integrate both sides ∫dy = - ∫dx

The result is y = - x

But since y = arctan(x), it follows that arctan(x) = - x

And since we know that x = ± i√2, it follows that arctan(i√2) = - i√2 and arctan(-i√2) = i√2

I know I must have done something wrong here. Could someone please point out the errors (which I'm sure are many o0)) in the above?
 
Thanks, Mark44. I actually just realized the error about 17 seconds after I clicked on "Create Thread".

I definitely should not quit my day welfare.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K