MHB Why is y = x^2 not one-to-one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The function y = x² is not one-to-one because multiple inputs yield the same output; for example, both x = -1 and x = 1 result in y = 1. This can be demonstrated mathematically, as solving for x gives x = ±√y, indicating two x-values for any positive y. While y = x² passes the vertical line test, confirming it is a function, it fails the horizontal line test, which confirms it is not one-to-one. The discussion highlights the importance of domain restrictions to achieve a one-to-one function. Overall, y = x² is a valid function but does not meet the criteria for being one-to-one.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Why is y = x^2 not one-to-one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider y = 1...there are two inputs (x = -1 and x = 1) that map to y = 1. And so y = x² is not one-to-one. :D

If we try to solve for x, we get:

$$x=\pm\sqrt{y}$$

This tells us that for a particular y greater than zero, we have 2 x's that map to it...unless we restrict x (the domain) such that it is either non-negative or non-positive.
 
Ok. If we let x = 1 or -1 for y = x^2, both values lead to y = 1 after squaring. We can also say that y goes to 1 for both values of x. The conclusion is that the parabola y = x^2 is a function but not one-to-one.

Correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
The conclusion is that the parabola y = x^2 is a function but not one-to-one.

Correct?

It passes the vertical line test, and so is a function, but fails the horizontal line test, and so is not one-to-one. :D
 
I like the vertical and horizontal line tests.

Question:

When does an expression fail to be a function?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top