Why isn't there a Theoretical Physics section?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrackerMcGinger
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the absence of a dedicated Theoretical Physics section in the forums, despite the inclusion of both theoretical and experimental physics topics. Participants emphasize that personal theories cannot be discussed according to forum rules, which prioritize established scientific discourse. The suggestion to publish theories in a journal is reiterated as the appropriate avenue for sharing new ideas. The conversation underscores that only accepted theories are permitted in the forum, excluding unverified personal theories. Overall, the forum maintains a strict policy against speculative discussions.
CrackerMcGinger
Messages
86
Reaction score
4
I have many theories, some of which I almost have enough evidence to make it something worth many peoples thought. However, I don't see a Theoretical Physics section in the forums.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All our forums cover both theoretical and experimental physics.

CrackerMcGinger said:
I have many theories, some of which I almost have enough evidence to make it something worth many peoples thought.
Then publish them in a journal. That's the way science is done.
Our forum rules do not allow the discussion of personal theories here.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Dale, Nugatory and 1 other person
mfb said:
All our forums cover both theoretical and experimental physics.

Then publish them in a journal. That's the way science is done.
Our forum rules do not allow the discussion of personal theories here.

Even if it has basis on accepted theories?
 
CrackerMcGinger said:
Even if it has basis on accepted theories?
If it is a theory (or an attempt of one), but not an accepted theory on its own, it is not allowed.
 
mfb said:
If it is a theory (or an attempt of one), but not an accepted theory on its own, it is not allowed.

Understood.
 
  • Like
Likes Amrator and Greg Bernhardt
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
190
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top