Why light is not considered as a longitudinal wave?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 4K views
Trojan666ru
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I would like see the reasons why light is not considered as a LWave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the quantity described in the amplitude of an electromagnetic wave is typically oriented perpendicular to the direction of propagation in physical space.

There are exceptions (like in plasmas), but that's a special circumstance.
 
Nobody is clear in their answers.
I would like to hear the reasons
It can be polarised! What?
 
I don't know how much more clear I can be. Longitudinal waves cannot be polarized. Light can be polarized. Therefore light cannot be a longitudinal wave.
 
How do we find that light can be polarized? Any experiment?
 
DaleSpam said:
I don't know how much more clear I can be. Longitudinal waves cannot be polarized. Light can be polarized. Therefore light cannot be a longitudinal wave.

Is that the only reason why light is considered as a traverse wave?
 
Pythagorean gave another reason, and there are most likely still other reasons. All the reasons are equivalent mathematically, but to me the polarization is the one that seems most clear.
 
Trojan666ru said:
How do we find that light can be polarized? Any experiment?
Sure, take two polarizing filters (e.g. lenses from sunglasses), make light pass through both, and rotate them relative to each other to see light be blocked completely or pass.
 
Light can be polarised longitudinally! (e.g. in an optical fibre or other waveguide structure).

In a vacuum, however, Maxwell's equations dictate that light cannot have a longitudinally polarised component.

Claude.
 
Trojan666ru said:
Nobody is clear in their answers.
I would like to hear the reasons
It can be polarised! What?

This is very confusing, and no one has asked the OP one very obvious question, so I will ask.

Trojan666ru: have you ever solved Maxwell equation to obtain the light's wave equation?

If you haven't, please look at that first and see if that answers your question.

If you have, then what is the issue, considering that the transverse description of light just drops onto your lap when you solve it?

Zz.