Why mathematicians defined slope?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and significance of slope in mathematics and its applications in architecture and engineering. Participants explore the historical context, practical uses, and mathematical implications of slope, particularly in relation to construction and rate of change in various fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that slope is defined to mathematically and geometrically represent the rate of change, particularly in calculus and physics.
  • Others argue that slope provides a practical means for architects to communicate the steepness of roofs to carpenters, often using ratios like rise over run.
  • A few participants question why architects do not specify angles directly, proposing that the use of ratios is more practical given the tools available to carpenters.
  • There is a discussion about how slope can be expressed in various forms, such as ratios, angles, and percentages, without changing its fundamental nature.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the historical origins of the concept of slope, with one suggesting that it is an obvious geometric fact that predates formal mathematics.
  • Others mention that slope is crucial in fields like electronics, where understanding the slope of non-linear relationships is vital for operational calculations.
  • One participant claims that slope was first formalized by Newton in the context of mechanics, while others emphasize its common-sense application in everyday measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the historical origins of slope or its primary purpose, with multiple competing views remaining on its significance in mathematics and practical applications.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions touch on the limitations of defining slope strictly in terms of angles or ratios, and the dependency on the tools available for measurement, such as framing squares versus protractors.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying mathematics, architecture, engineering, and anyone curious about the practical applications of mathematical concepts in real-world scenarios.

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
  • Is it to show rate of change mathematically and geometically as the tan(theta) of a line, and to apply it to calculus , physics etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the architect wants to tell the carpenter how steep to make the roof, it is useful to have a way to do so.
 
I knew this
jbriggs444 said:
When the architect wants to tell the carpenter how steep to make the roof, it is useful to have a way to do so.
that
 
Why architect didn't told them to incline the roof at 30° or 60° etc and told them the length of roof
jbriggs444 said:
When the architect wants to tell the carpenter how steep to make the roof, it is useful to have a way to do so.
 
parshyaa said:
Why architect didn't told them to incline the roof at 30° or 60° etc and told them the length of roof
He enjoys smooth structures.
 
parshyaa said:
Why architect didn't told them to incline the roof at 30° or 60° etc and told them the length of roof
Because the carpenter has a framing square, not a protractor.
 
Okk then you mean that they tell them the ratio of raise to far like 3:1 or 2:1 and they use this ratio to make the roof, but then 800cm/400cm and 40cm/20cm will also be 2:1, then how they will decide the lengths
jbriggs444 said:
Because the carpenter has a framing square, not a protractor.
you
 
parshyaa said:
Okk then you mean that they tell them the ratio of raise to far like 3:1 or 2:1 and they use this ratio to make the roof, but then 800cm/400cm and 40cm/20cm will also be 2:1, then how they will decide the lengths
What is it that you are really trying to ask?

Slope is what it is. Whether we choose to describe it as "rise over horizontal run", "rise over diagonal run", "angle from the horizontal", "angle from the vertical", "percent grade" does not change it. But at the end of the day we still want to come up with an agreement between the architect and the carpenter on how to describe it so that the carpenter builds what the architect intends.

None of which has much to do with the length of the rafters except that we may also need to come up with a way to communicate that. Cubits, rods, feet, inches, meters, centimers, ... And a way to estimate that (e.g. Pythagoras theorem).
 
parshyaa said:
Okk then you mean that they tell them the ratio of raise to far like 3:1 or 2:1 and they use this ratio to make the roof, but then 800cm/400cm and 40cm/20cm will also be 2:1, then how they will decide the lengths
The Theorem of Pythagoras has been around for more than 2000 years. If the base and altitude of a right triangle are known, it's easy to compute the hypotenuse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
  • #10
"To make the roof" means how inclined it must be , if we knew the ratio we can tell hime and get the angle which architect wanted to make, as earlier he was not having protractor
Mark44 said:
The Theorem of Pythagoras has been around for more than 2000 years. If the base and altitude of a right triangle are known, it's easy to compute the hypotenuse.
 
  • #11
parshyaa said:
"To make the roof" means how inclined it must be
So tell us. How inclined must it be?
 
  • #12
Well, if slope was not defined how it was, how would you describe f'(a) where f(x) is a differentiable function and a belongs to its domain?
 
  • #13
jbriggs444 said:
So tell us. How inclined must it be?
You said that slope is used to tell how steeper is line or roof , you said that carpenter were not having protractor so that they can inclined them just by saying the angle , therefore architects defined slope to get the [approximate] idea of steepness. So I think that they tell them the rise and far ratio by telling them lengths of rise and far(as per the tan of the angle calculated by them) . With your opinion I think that architect may knew trigonometry at that time. so basically I think that they have introduced slope more importantly to display the rate of change graphically and mathematically. And steepness of roof or road may be its 2nd application, I don't have any evidance to prove it but I think introducing slope for rate of change is more appropriate, what's your opinion
 
  • #14
I just
parshyaa said:
You said that slope is used to tell how steeper is line or roof , you said that carpenter were not having protractor so that they can inclined them just by saying the angle , therefore architects defined slope to get the [approximate] idea of steepness. So I think that they tell them the rise and far ratio by telling them lengths of rise and far(as per the tan of the angle calculated by them) . With your opinion I think that architect may knew trigonometry at that time. so basically I think that they have introduced slope more importantly to display the rate of change graphically and mathematically. And steepness of roof or road may be its 2nd application, I don't have any evidance to prove it but I think introducing slope for rate of change is more appropriate, what's your opinion
I just want to know that how founder of slope must have introduced this concept.
 
  • #15
Looking for a historical record of the first fellow who thought up the idea that a fixed steepness of a roof corresponds to a fixed ratio between the height of the roof ridge and the width between the eaves is an exercise in futility. It is a pretty obvious geometric fact that certainly predates Euclid. The folks who built the Pyramids had a fairly decent handle on such matters.

What is the motivation for the question? Why does it matter?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
  • #16
jbriggs444 said:
Looking for a historical record of the first fellow who thought up the idea that a fixed steepness of a roof corresponds to a fixed ratio between the height of the roof ridge and the width between the eaves is an exercise in futility. It is a pretty obvious geometric fact that certainly predates Euclid. The folks who built the Pyramids had a fairly decent handle on such matters.

What is the motivation for the question? Why does it matter?
Yes I got it but can you give me the example for the architect and the carpenter . How architect told carpenter to make the roof steeper by telling him the slope. I totally agree with your answer but an example can make it more clearer. I read on wikipedia that slope is applied to the road by telling the % , 100% means 45° Inclined. I think similarly architects may have used some way to define steepness to the carpenter
 
  • #17
If a "mathematician" never existed, ordinary people would still be measuring slopes. Things change and it's common sense to measure the change. The changes happen at a certain rate and it's common sense to measure the rate of change. You have heard the statement "Mathematics is the language of science." In the case of slopes, "Mathematics is the language of common sense."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and parshyaa
  • #18
I
FactChecker said:
If a "mathematician" never existed, ordinary people would still be measuring slopes. Things change and it's common sense to measure the change. The changes happen at a certain rate and it's common sense to measure the rate of change. You have heard the statement "Mathematics is the language of science." In the case of slopes, "Mathematics is the language of common sense."
yes , therefore I think that slope may be introduced to show rate of change mathematically and geometrically.
 
  • #19
I believe slope was first formalized by Newton to solve mechanics problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
  • #20
Mee too, rate of change
 
  • #21
It's just a mathematical definition looking at a rate of change.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
  • #22
I am not a mathematician but only an electronic engineer.
In electronics, very often we have to work with non-linear input-output relationships (diodes, transistors, thermistors,..).
In most applications, we select a certain "operational point" on this non-linear characteristic using DC quantities (voltages and/or currents).
Then, it is very important to know the SLOPE of the characteristic in this particular operational point (bias point).
Fore example, for bipolar transistor amplifiers the slope of the voltage-in and current-out characteristic is the so-called "transconductance" - a key parameter for gain calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa and FactChecker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K