Why must a polynomial be finite in length? Is there such thing as a

AI Thread Summary
A polynomial must be finite in length because that is its defining characteristic; if it extends infinitely, it is classified as a power series instead. The concept of a recursive polynomial is questioned, but the term is not standard in mathematics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of definitions in understanding polynomial properties. Clarification on recursive polynomials leads to a search for more information. Overall, the distinction between polynomials and power series is crucial in mathematical terminology.
Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Why must a polynomial be finite in length? Is there such thing as a recursive polynomial? Thanks guys!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Kidphysics said:
Why must a polynomial be finite in length?
Well, because that's the definition. If it's infinite in length it's called a power series.

Is there such thing as a recursive polynomial? Thanks guys!
http://www.google.com/search?q=recursive+polynomial".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top