gen x
- 83
- 3
Why is grounded electrical system safer than isolated system?
Last edited:
The discussion centers on the necessity of grounding residential electrical systems for safety. Grounded systems provide a common ground connection that prevents overvoltage and protects insulation, ensuring that any exposed metal remains at zero volts, thus minimizing shock risk. The conversation highlights the dangers of isolated systems, particularly in scenarios where accidental connections to the earth can create hazardous conditions. Additionally, the limitations of Residual Current Devices (RCDs) in isolated systems are emphasized, as they rely on current imbalance to function effectively, which is not possible in completely floating systems.
PREREQUISITESElectrical engineers, safety inspectors, electricians, and anyone involved in residential electrical system design and safety compliance will benefit from this discussion.
No, maybe someone can put a link.Averagesupernova said:Have you done a search here on PF? It's been discussed. You will get the same answers from the same people in this thread that have previously explained it.
Because a common ground connection protects the insulation, by preventing overvoltage, that might break it down.gen x said:Why is grounded electrical system safer than isolated system?
If you have Googled this then you will have see a diagram of a grounded system. If every exposed piece of metal is connected to ground (and I mean every), then a person can touch any two thins and have only Zero Volts across them. =safegen x said:Why is grounded electrical system safer than isolated system?
Wherever persons can be in contact with electricity with voltage above 60 volts, the salty fluids inside their bodies can become a conducting path to electrons, which could interfere with the electrical control impulses reaching their muscles, especially the very important one named heart.gen x said:Why is grounded electrical system safer than isolated system?
It works better if you search for knowledge, not just answers. But kudos for recognizing that you must verify the information you find on the web. Answers are more appropriate for specific, detailed, questions. General subject matter questions, like what is grounding for, how does gravity work, etc., don't have simple answers. I think you may need to study electric circuits a bit more. The underlying concept is simple. In practice it can get rather complicated.gen x said:@sophiecentaur , @DaveE... this is not simple question for google, there are lots of wrong answers at google.
An RCD can't ever fix a fault. It is designed to disconnect power to the circuit where the fault exists. Do you know how this occurs? Do you know how an RCD determines there is a problem? An RCD consists of a current transformer with both the hot and neutral passing through it. If the current on the hot and neutral is the same then there is no signal coming out of the current transformer. In a grounded system if someone is getting a shock then the current will not be the same on the hot and neutral. Some current is passing through the body of the person getting shocked and not going back to the source on the neutral. This imbalance of current through the current transformer causes an output from the current transformer and triggers a disconnect.gen x said:Why his isolated system can't use RCD to fix the fault?
Both you and @sophiecentaur seem to be missing my point. Of course I realize that an RCD works by sensing unequal currents in the live and neutral. Those currents will NEVER be unequal if the system is completely floating. The system has to be referenced to something else (the earth) upstream of the current transformer of the RCD in order for the system to allow an RCD to work correctly.Baluncore said:But earth is not necessary, the trigger could be conduction to another A or N circuit on another RCD.
Can you expalin "If we get an earth fault at D (not simultaneous with C above) then we have the same situation with LINE1 becoming N and LINE2 becoming live" ?Averagesupernova said:@gen x the link you proved in post #12 makes sense. The user named transistor is basically correct although I will say that a fault the the actual soil is often not enough to trip a breaker or blow a fuse. It was implied in transistor's post that this would occur. However transistor did imply that resistance of the actual earth is high enough to not make a good conductor so I will just leave it at that
Averagesupernova said:An RCD can't ever fix a fault. It is designed to disconnect power to the circuit where the fault exists.
Averagesupernova said:Of course I realize that an RCD works by sensing unequal currents in the live and neutral. Those currents will NEVER be unequal if the system is completely floating. The system has to be referenced to something else (the earth) upstream of the current transformer of the RCD in order for the system to allow an RCD to work correctly.
Isn't definition of isolated electric system, system that is not connected to Earth?Averagesupernova said:Both diagrams in post #15 will cause the RCD to trip as they are drawn. But the way they are drawn do not guarantee a floating system. The chassis of the appliance is wired to the neutral. There is no way to guarantee the chassis of every appliance is not in contact with the actual earth. These drawings are not the true floating systems represented by the drawings you link to in post #12. You are arguing about your position of an ungrounded system and then provide drawings that are obviously not ungrounded. You are contradicting yourself.
How do you mean in contact with earth? Devices can't flaot in the air, becuase we are at planet Earth that has gravity.. ?Averagesupernova said:The chassis of the appliance is wired to the neutral. There is no way to guarantee the chassis of every appliance is not in contact with the actual earth.
Yes now part of current will travel through one person through earth to other person. RCD will not trip. Breaker will not cut power, because current is too low/earth has too big resistance, but current is enough to kill a person.Averagesupernova said:@gen x . Concerning your last diagram in post #17. Assume the chassis of your appliance is isolated from the actual earth. You've drawn with a fault from the red to the chassis. Remove that. Now have one person touch the red wire and a second person touch the blue wire. Both touch between the boxes drawn. They are standing on the earth without shoes. Do you understand how they will receive a shock and why the RCD will not trip?
Yes. You have the correct idea. In the USA we refer to the RCD as a a GFCI. A receptacle that contains GFCI protection is protected at 5 mA. Any device whether it's a circuit breaker or receptacle that's designed to prevent a shock through GFCI action is supposed to have a threshold of 5 mA. Receptacles have both line and load terminals. This way whatever is connected to the load side is protected as well.gen x said:Yes now part of current will travel through one person through earth to other person. RCD will not trip. Breaker will not cut power, because current is too low/earth has too big resistance, but current is enough to kill a person.
View attachment 368607
If I now connect neutral to earth, then RCD will trip at 30mA, because part of the current bypasses RCD via earth.
View attachment 368608
Is correct?
Why my diagram from post #15 without earth electrodes 1 and 2 is not isolated system?Averagesupernova said:Yes. You have the correct idea. In the USA we refer to the RCD as a a GFCI. A receptacle that contains GFCI protection is protected at 5 mA. Any device whether it's a circuit breaker or receptacle that's designed to prevent a shock through GFCI action is supposed to have a threshold of 5 mA. Receptacles have both line and load terminals. This way whatever is connected to the load side is protected as well.
You cannot guarantee that the chassis of an appliance will forever remain isolated from the earth. A washing machine is connected to piping and eventually that piping is connected to the earth. Even with plastic pipe in your home, eventually the water that those pipes carry will contact the earth.gen x said:Why my diagram from post #15 without earth electrodes 1 and 2 is not isolated system?
But you can't guarantee at any isolated system that will remain isolated to the earth, here connection to the earth we treat as fault? So this is fault case?Averagesupernova said:You cannot guarantee that the chassis of an appliance will forever remain isolated from the earth. A washing machine is connected to piping and eventually that piping is connected to the earth. Even with plastic pipe in your home, eventually the water that those pipes carry will contact the earth.
Of course it wasnt self revealed, because it didnt have RCD, if it had it will trip. For this case earth is not needed to RCD trip.Averagesupernova said:I don't intend to chase every link you provide since there are endless misconceptions with someone either spouting off how they think it should be or someone else correcting them.
-
I have run across a situation in a basement where a wire got stuck between the screw that holds the light switch in and the side of the box that enclosed the switch. The house was wired in the 1950s and I found this in the mid 1980s. The box was not grounded and follows the exact scenario described above about not self revealing. It was revealed when someone touched it.
The point was that this sort of thing happens "in the wild". The real world example I gave did not have the conduit or switch box connected to the neutral back at the main panel. It was not required at the time. The metal box and pipe were floating. The USA has used a ground (earthing) rod since the beginning. Had the conduit and box been connected to the neutral in the main panel the breaker would have tripped at the time. Prior to the switch to breakers, the fuse would have blown.gen x said:Of course it wasnt self revealed, because it didnt have RCD, if it had it will trip. For this case earth is not needed to RCD trip.
This!!! RCD/GFCI should not be used as primary protection. They are an additional safety feature which simply isn't as reliable as good construction. Other code requirements are still necessary.Averagesupernova said:Any installation that is relying on a GFCI to trip to protect people when they touch it rather than stopping an unsafe situation prior is asinine.
What is good primary protection and good construction?DaveE said:This!!! RCD/GFCI should not be used as primary protection. They are an additional safety feature which simply isn't as reliable as good construction. Other code requirements are still necessary.