Why not sterile particles as dark matter?

bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
It seems that the most popular hypothesis is that dark matter consists of WIMPs. Can the existing data be described with sterile particles rather than ones that interact through the weak force? Is the only reason to prefer WIMPs that they are predicted by SUSY? (To me, as a nonspecialist, SUSY seems like a failed idea.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the particles are truly sterile, how were they produced?
 
  • Like
Likes nikkkom, Demystifier and bcrowell
Vanadium 50 said:
If the particles are truly sterile, how were they produced?

Ah...that makes sense...

I guess one possibility is they could have been created by gravitational processes in the very early universe, but then I suppose that in order to match the current density of dark matter, we would have needed a high density at early times, which would not be consistent with cosmological data. Or we could imagine sufficiently energetic gravitational processes in the more recent past, but that seems unlikely.

Why do the above considerations not apply to sterile neutrinos, though? We can have neutrino oscillations to produce them, I guess...? I don't understand how this can be consistent with the observed solar neutrino flux.

Is it possible to make their electroweak charge very small (much less than for neutrinos or quarks), but not zero? I would think that their rate of production would then be very small, but their rate of annihilation would also be very small. Wouldn't that imply that their equilibrium concentration could be significant? Or is there some principle similar to quantization of electric charge that says you can't have an electroweak charge less than the standard unit?
 
There are only two problems with sterile neutrinos: "sterile" and "neutrinos".

Absolutely sterile we covered. You're right that almost sterile might be made to work, depending on how almost is almost. Neutrinos have the additional problem that they move too fast to create the large scale structure we see. If you try and make the sterile neutrino heavy to fix that, its oscillation probability goes way, way down, so you don't make very many. (ueV things mix poorly with GeV things)
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and bcrowell
Vanadium 50 said:
If the particles are truly sterile, how were they produced?

would axions or ultra light scalar qualify as sterile?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There are only two problems with sterile neutrinos: "sterile" and "neutrinos".

Absolutely sterile we covered. You're right that almost sterile might be made to work, depending on how almost is almost. Neutrinos have the additional problem that they move too fast to create the large scale structure we see. If you try and make the sterile neutrino heavy to fix that, its oscillation probability goes way, way down, so you don't make very many. (ueV things mix poorly with GeV things)

Yea typically sterile neutrinos that are used for the purpose of creating dark matter have a significant production problem. Most of the methods (resonant production etc) found in the literature don't really work well from a model building point of view (they typically lead to conflicts with structure formation), but the method that is still viable is relatively low kev mass neutrinos produced via the decay of a heavy scalar. Often this is wrapped into the physics of the inflaton, but in principle it could come from many different larger embeddings.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top