Why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at

  • Thread starter Thread starter future Einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Pressure in a liquid at a given depth is determined solely by the weight of the liquid above it, not by the shape or volume of the container. This means that in different shaped vessels, as long as the height of the liquid column is the same, the pressure at that depth will also be the same. The presence of walls or the shape of the vessel does not affect the pressure because it is a function of depth and density. Therefore, regardless of the container's design, the pressure at the same height remains consistent. Understanding this principle clarifies why pressure behaves uniformly in liquids across various vessel shapes.
future Einstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at same height same thought they are of different volumes and shapes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really don't understand this question.
Could you rephrase it?
 
He's asking why pressure increases with depth in the same manner regardless of the shape of the container.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes future Einstein
rcgldr said:
He's asking why pressure increases with depth in the same manner regardless of the space of the container.
Yes.. Thats right..answer me please
 
future Einstein said:
why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at same height same thought they are of different volumes and shapes?
Why should it be different?
 
Why should it matter if there is a wall next to the water or just more water?

Or:

If pressure is equal to the weight of the water above (divided by area), why would it matter what is next to it?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top