Why Professional Physicists Are Proud of Their Profession

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between physicists and chemists regarding professional titles and recognition. It highlights that in many countries, certain scientific professions, like engineering and chemistry, are regulated, requiring formal qualifications to use the title "professional." This is less common for physicists, who often use the term to differentiate between those in academia and those working in industry. The conversation also touches on the importance of expertise in fields where public safety is a concern, emphasizing that individuals providing services should prove their qualifications. Additionally, it advocates for openness in scientific discourse, allowing contributions from outside the established academic system, although notable contributions from non-credentialed individuals are rare. Examples of such contributions include those from amateur mathematicians who have collaborated with established professionals to publish their work.
Rajini
Messages
619
Reaction score
4
Hello all,

why physicists are proud to say that they are 'professional physicist'?? Also physicist are dare and bare to say that they don't know chemistry as well as i am not a chemist!
But i rarely notice scientists saying ' i am a professional chemist'??..

why so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dunno.

I'm an amateur physicist, fwiw. :D
 
Rajini said:
But i rarely notice scientists saying ' i am a professional chemist'??..
It tends to be the other way around. In a lot of countries some professions are protected - you can't just call yourself an engineer or chemist, just like you can't call yourself a doctor or lawyer.

This is more common in jobs with a public safety concern like engineering or chemistry, physicists tend not to be directly involved in the final design of things so professional physics registration isn't as common.

I think people say "professional physicist" more to distinguish themselves from academic physicists - ie. they are saying that they work in industry or industrial research.
 
Last edited:
Okay, yes absolutely you can't call doctor or lawyer (without getting degree in those areas)..
 
Rajini said:
Okay, yes absolutely you can't call doctor or lawyer (without getting degree in those areas)..
I think there are two things here.

First, there is someone claiming expertise in order to provide others with a service, be it an expert opinion or the solution to a particular problem where there are concrete consequences if that solution is wrong.

In this first case, of course, it is right and proper that the individual involved should be able to provide proof of their expertise.

But second, there is someone who is simply putting forward ideas in the pursuit of pure science.

In this second case, I think it is important to, in theory at least, leave the field open to those outside the establishment. After all, possibly the most brilliant mathematician alive is a rather private chap who lives with his mum in St Petersburg and works all on his own.
 
Sea Cow said:
In this second case, I think it is important to, in theory at least, leave the field open to those outside the establishment. After all, possibly the most brilliant mathematician alive is a rather private chap who lives with his mum in St Petersburg and works all on his own.
Ahaha

didn't he quit and is now trying to break through as a violinist?
 
SeaCow said:
...

But second, there is someone who is simply putting forward ideas in the pursuit of pure science.

In this second case, I think it is important to, in theory at least, leave the field open to those outside the establishment. After all, possibly the most brilliant mathematician alive is a rather private chap who lives with his mum in St Petersburg and works all on his own.

True that, but Grigori Pereleman (sp?) does have a Ph.D. in mathematics (with the attendant work) and took fellowships and postdocs. Not that non-credentialed people haven't been able to make contributions--but they are far and few inbetween, and usually worked with mathematicians 'in the system' to realize their contributions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amateur_mathematicians

One of the more recent ones was Marjorie Rice who, despite only a high school educatio,n had an interest in Penrose Tilings, read work in the field, and worked with a mathematician at a local university (IIRC) to get her work published:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Rice
 
Back
Top