Why s is substitute with jw in transfer function?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the substitution of \( s \) with \( j\omega \) in transfer functions, specifically exploring the implications for gain values in linear systems. Participants delve into the relationship between the Laplace transform and the Fourier transform, as well as the characteristics of linear and time-invariant systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that the substitution \( s = j\omega \) in the transfer function \( G(s) \) allows for the evaluation of the system's gain at a specific frequency \( \omega \).
  • Another participant notes that the difference between the bilateral Laplace transform and the Fourier transform is the substitution \( s = j\omega \), linking \( G(j\omega) \) to the Fourier transform of the impulse response.
  • It is suggested that applying a sinusoidal input at frequency \( \omega \) can help determine the gain of the system, as it reflects the system's response at that frequency.
  • Several participants inquire about the definition of a linear system, with one providing a definition based on the principle of superposition, stating that the sum of inputs equals the sum of outputs.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of time invariance in systems, explaining that a delay in input results in an equivalent delay in output.
  • A participant introduces the concept of the Neper frequency \( \sigma \) in relation to \( s \), explaining its role in decay rates when negative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding linear systems and time invariance, with some seeking clarification. There is no consensus on a singular definition of a linear system, and the discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications of the substitution in transfer functions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity on the definitions of linearity and time invariance, indicating that these concepts are foundational yet not universally understood among beginners.

hilman
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Can anybody explain to me briefly on why in a transfer function like G(s), we substitute s=jw such that it become G(jw) in order to find its gain value?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can explain it in a variety of ways, but I prefer this one, since it's quite general:

The only difference between the bilateral Laplace transform:
$$
G(s) = \mathcal{L}\{f(t)\} = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-st} f(t)dt\\
$$
and the Fourier transform:
$$
H(\omega) = \mathcal{F}\{f(t)\} = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-j\omega t} f(t) dt
$$
is the variable substitution ##s = j\omega##, i.e. ##H(\omega) = G(s)\left.\right|_{s = j\omega} = G(j\omega)##.

For some system with transfer function ##G(s)##, ##G(s)## is also its impulse response, which makes ##G(j\omega)## the Fourier transform of its impulse response.

More intuitively:
To find the gain of a linear system at some frequency ##\omega##, you could apply a sinusoidal input with frequency ##\omega## and unity amplitude, and observe the amplitude of the output signal, which directly gives you the gain of the system at ##\omega##.

An ideal impulse has components with unity amplitude at all frequencies, and thus ##G(j\omega)## "picks out" the gain and phase of the system at ##\omega## from its impulse response.

Makes sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hilman
Wow, I like your answer. I am still a beginner in this kind of things and I can understand most of your answer. But one question. What is exactly a linear system?
Thanks in advance
 
hilman said:
Wow, I like your answer. I am still a beginner in this kind of things and I can understand most of your answer. But one question. What is exactly a linear system?
Thanks in advance
a big thing in looking at systems like this is knowing if they are linear and if they are time invarient.

you should know these

Linear:: more or less to be a linear system the sum of two inputs have to equal the sum of the two outputs
x1(n)=y1(n)
x2(n)=y2(n)
so in order to be linear
x1(n)+x2(n)=y1(n)+Y2(n)

then continue that out to inf and -inf

for a system that is time invariant, delaying the input by a constant delays the output by the same amount.

given the system x(t)=y(t)

x(t-d)=y(t-d) for all values of t and d
 
donpacino said:
a big thing in looking at systems like this is knowing if they are linear and if they are time invarient.

you should know these

Linear:: more or less to be a linear system the sum of two inputs have to equal the sum of the two outputs
x1(n)=y1(n)
x2(n)=y2(n)
so in order to be linear
x1(n)+x2(n)=y1(n)+Y2(n)

then continue that out to inf and -inf
basically, this means if you graph the system, it will be a straight line.

for a system that is time invariant, delaying the input by a constant delays the output by the same amount.

given the system x(t)=y(t)

x(t-d)=y(t-d) for all values of t and d
 
Generally,

## s = \sigma + j \omega##

When ##\sigma = 0##, ##s = j \omega##

## \sigma ## is the Neper frequency. It tells us the rate at which the function decays (when it is negative).

## \omega ## is the radial frequency. It tells us the rate at which the function oscillates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K