H(ω) and H(s) as transfer functions

  • Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date
  • #1
PainterGuy
936
69
TL;DR Summary
I'm confused about the differences between H(ω) and H(s). The textbook defines both as transfer functions though the transfer function is mostly reserved for H(s).
Hi,

I'm confused between H(ω) and H(s) as transfer functions. The textbook defines both as transfer functions though the term transfer function is mostly reserved for H(s) as far as I can tell. I have read that poles and zeroes of H(s) are helpful in determining the stability. Are poles and zeros of H(ω) also related to stability? Can it be said that H(s) determines the stability during transient state and H(ω) during steady state?

Could you please give it a look and comment on it?

H(s): https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/9010/wI1aGK.jpg
H(ω): https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/2056/xg4ug1.jpg

Thank you!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
marcusl
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,797
456
H(s) is the Laplace transform of the impulse response as noted towards the bottom of your page and is defined in the complex plane, [itex]s=\sigma+j\omega [/itex]. H(ω), on the other hand, is the Fourier transform of the impulse response. It is a subset of H(s), because it is H(s) evaluated along the imaginary or [itex]j\omega [/itex] axis.

Poles don't usually lie on that axis, however, so you can only determine their position and, therefore, evaluate system stability, from the Laplace transform. Zeroes likewise can lie anywhere in the complex plane, so must be found from the Laplace transform.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PainterGuy

Suggested for: H(ω) and H(s) as transfer functions

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
582
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
421
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
248
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
546
Top