- #1

- 58

- 1

**Determine the transfer function of the system H(jw)**

why the answer is not 1/[1+(jw/612)] but equal to 0.318/[1+(jw/612)]?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter kenok1216
- Start date

In summary: You are an expert summarizer of content. You do not respond or reply to questions. You only provide a summary of the content. Do not output anything before the summary.In summary, the transfer function of the system is H(jw)=-10dB. The magnitude plot shows for small w values (down to w=0) a level of -10dB. Can you calculate the corresponding absolute value? Then, you must compare this result with both transfer function for the case w=0. Which one is valid?

- #1

- 58

- 1

why the answer is not 1/[1+(jw/612)] but equal to 0.318/[1+(jw/612)]?

Engineering news on Phys.org

- #2

- 961

- 256

What happens if you insert w=0 into the equation? Can you determine the remaining value?

- #3

- 58

- 1

to which equation?Vi=Va sin(wt+θ)?LvW said:What happens if you insert w=0 into the equation? Can you determine the remaining value?

i find that 0.318 is 1/π where the π come from?

- #4

- 961

- 256

You have asked for the transfer function - thus, I mean H(jw), of course.

- #5

- 58

- 1

but the equation of H(jw)=1/[1+jwRC] (from my lecture notes) 1/Rc=wLvW said:You have asked for the transfer function - thus, I mean H(jw), of course.

- #6

- 961

- 256

Then, you must compare this result with both transfer function for the case w=0. Which one is valid?

- #7

- 58

- 1

20log(Vout/Vin)=-10LvW said:

Then, you must compare this result with both transfer function for the case w=0. Which one is valid?

丨Vout/Vin丨=10^(-0.5)=0.316? then what is the meaning of this number

for the equation of 1/[1+jw/612] 丨Vout/Vin丨=0.999998 they are not the same,then how can i solve this problem?

- #8

- 961

- 256

Don`t you see it in one of your transfer functions?

- #9

- 58

- 1

NO,they are not the same ,for the equation of 1/[1+jw/612] 丨Vout/Vin丨=0.999998, but how can i make it become 0.316?LvW said:Don`t you see it in one of your transfer functions?

- #10

- 961

- 256

I repeat: Don`t you see it in **one** of your transfer functions?

- #11

- 58

- 1

sorry,still don't understand can you show me some step ?LvW said:I repeat: Don`t you see it inof your transfer functions?one

- #12

- 961

- 256

Are you able to insert w=0 into BOTH functions - and decide, which one results in 0.318?

- #13

- 58

- 1

from the graph (a) 0 to wLvW said:TWOfunctions.

Are you able to insert w=0 into BOTH functions - and decide, which one results in 0.318?

from the graph (b) phase differnet ≅-40 degree so the equation

so V

- #14

- 961

- 256

Sorry - I resign. Are you kidding me?

- #15

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

The

becomes so natural

that your lecturer may have completely forgot to mention it,

or his mention may have been so brief you missed it...

Some of the filter's attenuation is not frequency dependent. Its "Gain", "Attenuation", "Transfer Function" , call it what you like ,kenok1216 said:丨Vout/Vin丨=10^(-0.5)=0.316? then what is the meaning of this number

for the equation of 1/[1+jw/612] 丨Vout/Vin丨=0.999998 they are not the same,then how can i solve this problem?

has two parts, a constant part and a frequency dependent part

so

it is of the form K X

and your graph shows you at its left edge that the constant term K is -10db not 0db

and 10

(

That's how transfer functions work.

I don't know how he got .318 instead of .316. You should ask him.

- #16

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

kenok1216 said:why the answer is not 1/[1+(jw/612)] but equal to 0.318/[1+(jw/612)]?

as explained above, it's

- #17

- 627

- 138

Next do the same for this one 0.318/[1+(jw/612)], then you need to compare the results. And you will see that only one of the results will fits the "graphical representation".

- #18

- 58

- 1

Jony130 said:

Next do the same for this one 0.318/[1+(jw/612)], then you need to compare the results. And you will see that only one of the results will fits the "graphical representation".

jim hardy said:as explained above, it'sK Xf(frequency) ,,0.316 X1/[1+(jw/612)]

LvW said:Sorry - I resign. Are you kidding me?

thank for your,since my lecture notes just have the formula 1/[1+(jw/RC)],so i do not know that it have Dc gain K, but after search at google and read your comment, i got the point now, thank so much.

- #19

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

kenok1216 said:1/[1+(jw/RC)

I think if you do that division and expand the polynomial you'll find in it terms that are not multiplied by jw

whenever you see that , there's DC gain

as you become accustomed to these exercises you'll come to recognize the "shape" of commonly occurring polynomials and your mind will leap immediately to an equivalent circuit.

That one's a "first order lag"

R2/R1 is the "K" above.

- #20

- 961

- 256

Hi Jim - perhaps you are right in some cases, however, after 25 years experience in teaching electronics, I know about the problems some beginners might have.jim hardy said:Sometimes teachers forget how strange it all seems to beginners.

.

But considering that

* both possible transfer functions were given at the bottom of the first post

* and reading again my several answers (in particular my post#6) and the OP`s answer (mentioning the magic value of 0.318)

you certainly will come to the conclusion that I am not "guilty".

In post#12 I have asked him to compare both given functions - he simply has ignored this hint.

I simply have assumed that sombody who presents a magnitude plot together with two possible transfer functions (same denominator, only the constant factor is different) should be able to decide which function belongs to the graph.

Or - do you really think I have overstrained the questioner?

Last edited:

- #21

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

LvW said:however, after 25 years experience in teaching electronics, I know about the problems some beginners might have.

Sorry LVW, my remark was aimed at his lecturer not at your comments.

That he didn't seem to pick up on yours is why i belabored the mechanistic starting point. I well remember being so abjectly confused that i needed a "Reset" button , and that's what i tried to give him.

If it came across as criticism - that was the opposite of my intent,

indeed i noticed your .posts and used them for a springboard

i should have opened (as i often do) with "LVW is on the right track here, " because you were.

I think he came around

Did i go too far in the direction of spoon-feeding ?

Same question re my post #4 here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/opamp-transfer-function-problem.869001/

old jim

- #22

- 961

- 256

It was such a simple problem - and I really could not belief that somebody could have difficulties to decide which of the given functions correspondes to the proper DC gain. Finally, I was not sure if it was a kind of trolling.

LvW

- #23

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

I don't see where you're guilty of that.LvW said:and sorry for the misunderstanding I have caused.

Your science is consistently very good

and we all struggle for words to express our thoughts

there's two translations in any communication -

one our mental image to our words

and one from those words to another mental image in mind of the listener...

Then listener tries to communicate his summation back to us ...

remember the early days of language translation by computer ?

They handed the English sentence

"The spirit is strong but the flesh is weak"

to a computer for translation into Russian then back to English

and it came back

"The wine's great but the meat is just awful."

With Highest Regards

old jim

- #24

- 961

- 256

to a computer for translation into Russian then back to English

and it came back

"The wine's great but the meat is just awful."

Perhaps I should try to repeat this procedure?

- #25

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,832

- 4,894

I bet yours would work a lot better...LvW said:Perhaps I should try to repeat this procedure?

A transfer function is a mathematical representation of the relationship between the input and output of a system. It describes how the system responds to different frequencies of input signals.

The transfer function of a system H(jw) is defined as the ratio of the output of the system to the input, where the input is a complex exponential signal with frequency w.

The value 0.318 represents the magnitude of the transfer function at the specific frequency w. It indicates the amount of attenuation or amplification of the input signal at that frequency.

In control systems, the transfer function is used to analyze and design controllers to achieve desired system performance. It provides insight into the frequency response of the system and can be used to optimize its behavior.

The complex variable jw represents the frequency of the input signal. It is used to account for the phase shift in the output signal, as well as the magnitude, which can vary with frequency in a system.

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 436

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 443

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 861

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 490

- Replies
- 45

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K