Why the roots of Eq. x^2 + a*x + b = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lucasss84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The roots of the equations x^2 + a*x + b = 0 and x + a*Sqrt[x] + b = 0 differ because they represent different mathematical forms. The second equation can be transformed by substituting y = Sqrt[x], resulting in the quadratic equation y^2 + a*y + b = 0. While the solutions for y correspond to those of the first equation, they must be squared to find the values of x, leading to different roots. The discussion also seeks clarification on how to express the second equation in simple fractions, indicating a need for further explanation on that topic. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for solving the equations accurately.
Lucasss84
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why the roots of Eq. x^2 + a*x + b = 0 and of Eq. x + a*Sqrt[x] + b = 0 are not identically? How can I expand the second Eq. in simple fractions: x + a*Sqrt[x] + b = ... ?
Thank you. Lucas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Because they are different equations! In the second equation, you can substitute y=\sqrt{x} and it becomes y^2+ay+b=0. Now the solution to the second equation is the same as the solution of the first, but remember that the solution we've got for the second equation is y, not x! To find x, you have to square the solution you've got, and the solutions are different.
 


Now, what do you mean by "expand in simple fractions"?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top