abdossamad2003
- 68
- 4
Why is this equation (red sign) written in constant volume and not in constant pressure?
The discussion revolves around the use of constant volume in an adiabatic equation, particularly in relation to the internal energy of a gas and its heat capacity. Participants explore the implications of constant volume versus constant pressure in thermodynamic processes, focusing on ideal gases.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views regarding the relationship between internal energy, heat capacity, and the conditions of the process remain. Disagreement exists on whether constant volume is appropriate for the adiabatic equation.
There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of constant volume and constant pressure in the context of adiabatic processes, as well as the implications of these conditions on internal energy changes.
This is totally incorrect. Irrespective of the process, the internal energy of an ideal gas depends only on temperature, and not volume.abdossamad2003 said:The effect of volume on the internal energy is meaningful only in diabatic processes, for example, when heat is added to the system at a constant volume and the internal energy increases, but in adiabatic processes, when the volume is constant, the work done on the system is zero and the incoming heat is zero, as a result of the change in energy Internal is zero.
See, e.g., here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_energy#Internal_energy_of_the_ideal_gas. ##C_V## is the coefficient of proportionality between internal energy on one hand and number of moles and temperature of the gas on the other hand.abdossamad2003 said:I was not convinced why internal energy should be written for heat capacity in constant volume. This process does not take place in constant volume, and if it is in constant volume, the change in internal energy must be zero.