I Why Use Constant Volume for This Adiabatic Equation?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter abdossamad2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adiabatic equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between internal energy and heat capacity in gases, particularly questioning why internal energy is expressed in terms of constant volume rather than constant pressure. It is argued that internal energy changes only with temperature, not volume, and that in adiabatic processes, the work done and heat transfer are zero, leading to no change in internal energy. Some participants express confusion over the application of constant volume in this context, suggesting that constant pressure may be more appropriate. The consensus emphasizes that internal energy for an ideal gas is fundamentally linked to temperature, regardless of volume changes. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which internal energy is defined.
abdossamad2003
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
Why is this equation (red sign) written in constant volume and not in constant pressure?
Screenshot 2023-11-07 20.46.13.png
 
Science news on Phys.org
Because this is what counts for the internal energy of the gas.
 
I was not convinced why internal energy should be written for heat capacity in constant volume. This process does not take place in constant volume, and if it is in constant volume, the change in internal energy must be zero.
 
The work is done on the adiabatic system, that is, it is not in constant volume, in my opinion, constant pressure seems more reasonable
 
What is your understanding of the effect of volume on the internal energy of an ideal gas?
 
The effect of volume on the internal energy is meaningful only in diabatic processes, for example, when heat is added to the system at a constant volume and the internal energy increases, but in adiabatic processes, when the volume is constant, the work done on the system is zero and the incoming heat is zero, as a result of the change in energy Internal is zero.
 
abdossamad2003 said:
The effect of volume on the internal energy is meaningful only in diabatic processes, for example, when heat is added to the system at a constant volume and the internal energy increases, but in adiabatic processes, when the volume is constant, the work done on the system is zero and the incoming heat is zero, as a result of the change in energy Internal is zero.
This is totally incorrect. Irrespective of the process, the internal energy of an ideal gas depends only on temperature, and not volume.
 
Last edited:
abdossamad2003 said:
I was not convinced why internal energy should be written for heat capacity in constant volume. This process does not take place in constant volume, and if it is in constant volume, the change in internal energy must be zero.
See, e.g., here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_energy#Internal_energy_of_the_ideal_gas. ##C_V## is the coefficient of proportionality between internal energy on one hand and number of moles and temperature of the gas on the other hand.
 
Back
Top