Why use normal coordinates and what is the benefit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noamriemer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Coordinates
AI Thread Summary
Normal coordinates simplify the analysis of coupled oscillators by transforming the system into uncoupled equations, allowing each mode of motion to be analyzed independently. In the discussed system of two masses connected by springs, the original equations yield a coupled matrix that leads to trivial eigenvector solutions. By redefining coordinates to y_1 and y_2, the equations become independent, revealing distinct eigenfrequencies. This transformation is beneficial as it simplifies the problem, making it easier to solve for the system's behavior. Using normal coordinates is a preferred method in dynamics for analyzing systems with symmetry.
noamriemer
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I have a question regarding a method I saw every now and then:
Say I have a system containing of two masses, attached to one another by a spring. Each is attached to a wall by another spring.
Now I wish to know the eigen vectors and eigen values( \omega) of movement.

I get:
\ddot x_1= \frac {-2k} {m} x_1+\frac {k} {m} x_2
\ddot x_2= \frac {-2k} {m} x_2+\frac {k} {m} x_1

That is because the sysem is completely symmetric. Now, I get
{\omega_1}^{2}= \frac {3k} {m} and {\omega_2}^{2}= \frac {k} {m}
But if I try to find the eigen vectors using a matrix,

|5 -1 |
|-1 5 |
As you can see, the only solution is the trivial one.

So, what I saw was done in this case, was defining new coordinates:
y_1=x_1+x_2
y_2=x_1-x_2
And now it works, and everything is fine.
What I don't understand is why.

How is it that when I move to y-s it is ok?
Shouldn't I get the same result?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noamriemer said:
Hello!
I have a question regarding a method I saw every now and then:
Say I have a system containing of two masses, attached to one another by a spring. Each is attached to a wall by another spring.
Now I wish to know the eigen vectors and eigen values( \omega) of movement.

I get:
\ddot x_1= \frac {-2k} {m} x_1+\frac {k} {m} x_2
\ddot x_2= \frac {-2k} {m} x_2+\frac {k} {m} x_1

That is because the sysem is completely symmetric. Now, I get
{\omega_1}^{2}= \frac {3k} {m} and {\omega_2}^{2}= \frac {k} {m}
But if I try to find the eigen vectors using a matrix,

|5 -1 |
|-1 5 |
As you can see, the only solution is the trivial one.

So, what I saw was done in this case, was defining new coordinates:
y_1=x_1+x_2
y_2=x_1-x_2
And now it works, and everything is fine.
What I don't understand is why.

How is it that when I move to y-s it is ok?
Shouldn't I get the same result?
Thank you!

I'm not quite sure how you got your eigenvectors here. It's been a while but my recollection is that your matrix is something like [1 -1; 1 1]. Or maybe even that is wrong. With the original equation, you have two equations of second order so that's four unknowns for your coefficients that arise because each oscillator will be influenced by both eigenfrequencies. But the thing to note about the coordinate transform is that you have now gone to what are called normal coordinates. These normal coordinates are uncoupled and independent which allows you to write the equations of motion to be dependent upon a single eigenfrequency. So the uncoupled solutions makes this the more desirable method of analysis.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top