Why you call momentum for momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter archis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is defined as the product of mass and velocity (p=mv), while impulse refers to the change in momentum resulting from a force applied over time (Ft). The confusion arises from differing terminology across languages, with "impulss" in Latvian and Russian often equated with impulse rather than momentum. Despite the linguistic differences, the mathematical definitions of momentum and impulse remain consistent across languages. In English, everyday meanings of terms like force and momentum can differ from their scientific definitions, leading to further confusion. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for clear communication in physics.
archis
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
I am confused. For you, americans, value p=mv is momentum. But in my language (latvian and also in russian) we call it impulss. Whats wrong with the definitions? I think for you impulss is dP (F=dP/dt).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum comes from the Latin word Mótus, meaning movement or motion. Hence it is associated with velocity.

Impulse comes from the Latin impulsus meaning to push. Hence it is associated with Force.
 
Yes, impulse is force multiplied by time. Ft (=Change in momentum)
It has the same units as momentum.
The words may change from language to language but the definitions are mathematical, and are the same in all languages.
In English, for example, words like force, power, momentum and impulse have "everyday" meanings that do not necessarily correspond to their scientific meanings.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

The definition of generalised momentum
Replies
43
Views
4K
B Understanding Momentum: The Relationship Between Mass, Velocity, and Force
Replies
29
Views
3K
Question for anyone with Morin's "Introduction to Classical Mechanics"
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Rotating physicist and momentum conservation
Replies
12
Views
3K
Definite and indefinite integration in the definition of work
Replies
4
Views
8K
Is Impulse the anti derivative of momentum?
Replies
1
Views
7K
Insights How to Apply Newton’s Second Law to Variable Mass Systems
Replies
0
Views
2K
I Why is momentum considered a vector and kinetic energy a scalar?
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Lagrangian coordinate transformation (Noether)
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top