Will a Glass Ball Discharge in an Insulator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven Ellet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discharge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around whether a negatively charged glass ball placed inside an insulating case will discharge on its own. Participants explore concepts related to electrostatics, charge distribution, and leakage current mechanisms, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the glass ball will not discharge on its own if it is completely isolated, as the charge will remain evenly distributed on its surface.
  • Others argue that leakage current mechanisms will lead to a slow discharge over time, depending on the materials involved.
  • A participant questions the nature of extra electrons on the charged ball, wondering if they constitute a current and how that relates to discharging.
  • It is suggested that the distance between the ball and the insulating case can affect charge retention, with a smaller gap potentially allowing the charge to remain for extended periods.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of air as an insulator, noting that a thin layer of air can be a better insulator than thicker layers due to reduced ion production and collisions.
  • Paschen's law is referenced to explain how the breakdown strength of air increases as the gap width decreases, which may influence discharge behavior.
  • Participants mention practical examples, such as charged plastic foil, to illustrate how charge can be retained under specific conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the discharge of the glass ball, with no consensus reached on whether it will discharge on its own or under what conditions it may do so.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of leakage current and charge distribution, as well as the unresolved nature of the mechanisms involved in charge retention and discharge.

Steven Ellet
Messages
85
Reaction score
3
For example, if I negative charge a glass ball and put it into a rubber (or any insulator) case to shield it from being grounded, will it discharge on its own? I know that a capacitor will discharge with time( assuming that there is no input.)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Steven Ellet said:
For example, if I negative charge a glass ball and put it into a rubber (or any insulator) case to shield it from being grounded, will it discharge on its own? I know that a capacitor will discharge with time( assuming that there is no input.)

Welcome to the PF.

That comes down to leakage current mechanisms. With capacitors, there is some leakage current spec associated with each type of capacitor (check their datasheets for the numbers).

For other geometries, the leakage current mechanisms will be different. You can certainly come up with some situations where the leakage current is very low, like for an object in space, for example. Such an object will stay charged up for a very long time.
 
The insulated container your negative charged sphere is placed in is a dielectric material.
The charge on the surface of your sphere will attract positive charge to the inside surface of the insulator and so make the outside of the insulator less positive = negative. This is probably best considered as a problem of electrostatics, capacitance in series.
 
Please clarify

Berkeman, you mentioned "current mechanisms" which, in my mind, implies that the spare electrons that are gathered on the glass ball are moving more than the average electron which are already in the ball making the spare electrons electricity rather than just spare electrons, however, I was under the impression that in a charge object, the spare electrons don't move more than a normal electron without an outside force, am i wrong?
 
Steven Ellet said:
Berkeman, you mentioned "current mechanisms" which, in my mind, implies that the spare electrons that are gathered on the glass ball are moving more than the average electron which are already in the ball making the spare electrons electricity rather than just spare electrons, however, I was under the impression that in a charge object, the spare electrons don't move more than a normal electron without an outside force, am i wrong?

You missed the important word when you quoted berkeman he said Leakage current mechanisms.
I think you will find he is referring to the different ways a current/charge will leak from a charged surface. Think of say .. a capacitor .. .it has 2 parallel plates with a dielectric in between them. But no dielectric is a perfect insulator ... so the leakage mechanism there will be through the dielectric till the charge is balanced in both plates

There will be a "slow" discharge of your glass sphere into the rubber or other material that its sitting in.

on charged sphere ... the charge will be evenly distributed across the surface of the sphere

cheers
Dave
 
davenn the reason I left out leakage is because that was not my point. My point was do extra electrons have a current? If they have a current, then I expect it to discharge, but if there is no current will it still discharge?
 
it is the point :smile:

electrons DONT have a current
the movement of electrons is a current or moving charge

as hinted at earlier, if the glass sphere is totally isolated from anything else then any charge on the sphere be it positive or negative will spread out evenly over the sphere and remain there

And also as said earlier ... any contact with other material WILL cause leakage ( a small flow of current/charge) will, if left long enough, eventually find a balance of charge remaining on the sphere ( any other charged object)

Dave
 
Thank you

That is all I wanted to know, thank you. :approve:
 
If the distance between the ball and the insulating case is microscopically small all around the ball it may stay charged for years since such a thin layer of air is an incredibly good insulator in contrast to thick layers of air which are only moderately good insulators.
 
  • #10
DrZoidberg said:
If the distance between the ball and the insulating case is microscopically small all around the ball it may stay charged for years since such a thin layer of air is an incredibly good insulator in contrast to thick layers of air which are only moderately good insulators.

Interesting. Why is that?
 
  • #11
Maybe, if leakage is the result of ionising radiation reacting with the mass of air. Less air is less collisions, so less ions produced = lower leakage ? ? ?
 
  • #12
There are two effects here.
For once the breakdown strenght of air increases as the gap width decreases. That is predicted by Paschen's law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen's_law
At a few µm you need more than 40 MV/m while for a gap between 1cm and 1m it's around 3MV/m.
The second effect was explained already by Baluncore. There are not many ions in a tiny air gap so you can't get much of a current.
It's actually possible to "glue" two pieces of plastic foil together with static charge and under the right conditions (no moisture in between the foils, smooth surface so the gap is really small) the foil will stick together for many years.
You probably know that a roll of plastic foil can become charged when it's unrolled. But most people don't realize that that charge was put on the foil in the factory. It's not produced when you unroll it. Equal amounts of positive and negative charge are trapped in the roll of foil causing very strong fields in the gaps between the layers, while the total net charge is zero. That roll can be sitting on a shelf for years without loosing it's charge.
 
  • #13
Very interesting. Thanks! :smile
 
  • #14
DrZoidberg said:
There are two effects here.
For once the breakdown strenght of air increases as the gap width decreases. That is predicted by Paschen's law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen's_law
At a few µm you need more than 40 MV/m while for a gap between 1cm and 1m it's around 3MV/m.
The second effect was explained already by Baluncore. There are not many ions in a tiny air gap so you can't get much of a current.
It's actually possible to "glue" two pieces of plastic foil together with static charge and under the right conditions (no moisture in between the foils, smooth surface so the gap is really small) the foil will stick together for many years.
You probably know that a roll of plastic foil can become charged when it's unrolled. But most people don't realize that that charge was put on the foil in the factory. It's not produced when you unroll it. Equal amounts of positive and negative charge are trapped in the roll of foil causing very strong fields in the gaps between the layers, while the total net charge is zero. That roll can be sitting on a shelf for years without loosing it's charge.
Interesting DrZoidberg, but how would one know if there was the right level of air in between the material? or what the right level of air is?
 
  • #15
It doesn't need to be precise. You just need two smooth surfaces that touch each other, at least one of which should be a good insulator, the other one can either be insulating or conducting e.g. aluminum and polyethylen foil. Even though they appear to touch there really is a microscopically small gap over most of the area.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K