Will a High Vaccination Rate Affect Contact Tracing?

  • Context: COVID 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contact Rate tracing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A high vaccination rate significantly impacts the effectiveness of contact tracing in managing infectious diseases. As vaccination rates increase, the proportion of asymptomatic cases rises, complicating traditional contact tracing methods. In regions like Australia, where contact tracing is widely implemented, adjustments are necessary to account for asymptomatic individuals and the incubation period. Effective contact tracing may become more feasible as infection rates decline, allowing for a better ratio of infected individuals to trackers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vaccination impact on public health
  • Knowledge of contact tracing methodologies
  • Familiarity with asymptomatic infection dynamics
  • Awareness of diagnostic testing methods for infectious diseases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effectiveness of contact tracing in vaccinated populations
  • Explore methods for tracking asymptomatic COVID-19 cases
  • Learn about diagnostic testing techniques beyond antigen tests
  • Investigate contact tracing adaptations in response to vaccination rates
USEFUL FOR

Public health officials, epidemiologists, healthcare professionals, and anyone involved in pandemic response strategies will benefit from this discussion.

Messages
10,970
Reaction score
3,839
I heard an immunologist say the other day that once a high vaccination rate is achieved, contact tracing will likely not be effective. I can sort of understand why. Does anyone from places with a high vaccination rate know if contact tracing is still an effective measure? It is very widely used in Australia. If it no longer has value, it could hamper our efforts to contain it. Of course, vaccination itself helps greatly in controlling the pandemic.

Thanks
Bill
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I don't understand why this would be.

I would think that contract tracing would be less effective in populations with high rates of infection.
Too many infected people to make a reasonable attempt at figuring out all of their contacts impossible.
This seems to be the case in much of the US, maybe not now though as infection rates are going down.

As the infection rate lowers, there would be a better ratio of infected to trackers.
This should make it more feasible to track all infected people.
In addition, the infected will be fewer and could receive better treatment.
It really annoys (exceedingly much!) me that when this was first getting started here in the US, whoever was in charge, were not resolute enough to try hard to indentify, isolate, and treat all the infected people, early on.

Your question about high vaccination rates, to me implies low rates of infection, and thus a more feasible possibility of tracking infections in the population.

Maybe "they" think its not effective because they expect infections to continue dropping, or perhaps antibodies in the blood confound an antigen test.
However, there are other diagnostic methods, and I prefer a more cautious approach.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
With vaccination, we expect the proportion of asymptomatic cases to increase. So contact tracing must take that into account, eg. by testing close contacts even if they are not symptomatic, and by testing them at several intervals to take the incubation period into account. Some contact tracing systems are already doing this, but if they aren't, then they might need to change tactics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
21K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 516 ·
18
Replies
516
Views
37K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K