COVID Will a High Vaccination Rate Affect Contact Tracing?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of contact tracing in populations with high vaccination rates. An immunologist suggested that once a high vaccination rate is achieved, contact tracing may lose its efficacy. Participants express confusion over this viewpoint, noting that contact tracing could be less effective in areas with high infection rates due to the overwhelming number of cases, making it difficult to track contacts. However, as infection rates decline, the feasibility of effective contact tracing improves, allowing for better tracking and treatment of fewer infected individuals. The conversation also highlights the importance of adapting contact tracing methods to account for asymptomatic cases, suggesting that testing close contacts, regardless of symptoms, and conducting multiple tests over time could enhance effectiveness. Overall, while vaccination plays a crucial role in controlling the pandemic, the approach to contact tracing may need to evolve in response to changing infection dynamics.
Messages
10,901
Reaction score
3,782
I heard an immunologist say the other day that once a high vaccination rate is achieved, contact tracing will likely not be effective. I can sort of understand why. Does anyone from places with a high vaccination rate know if contact tracing is still an effective measure? It is very widely used in Australia. If it no longer has value, it could hamper our efforts to contain it. Of course, vaccination itself helps greatly in controlling the pandemic.

Thanks
Bill
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I don't understand why this would be.

I would think that contract tracing would be less effective in populations with high rates of infection.
Too many infected people to make a reasonable attempt at figuring out all of their contacts impossible.
This seems to be the case in much of the US, maybe not now though as infection rates are going down.

As the infection rate lowers, there would be a better ratio of infected to trackers.
This should make it more feasible to track all infected people.
In addition, the infected will be fewer and could receive better treatment.
It really annoys (exceedingly much!) me that when this was first getting started here in the US, whoever was in charge, were not resolute enough to try hard to indentify, isolate, and treat all the infected people, early on.

Your question about high vaccination rates, to me implies low rates of infection, and thus a more feasible possibility of tracking infections in the population.

Maybe "they" think its not effective because they expect infections to continue dropping, or perhaps antibodies in the blood confound an antigen test.
However, there are other diagnostic methods, and I prefer a more cautious approach.
 
With vaccination, we expect the proportion of asymptomatic cases to increase. So contact tracing must take that into account, eg. by testing close contacts even if they are not symptomatic, and by testing them at several intervals to take the incubation period into account. Some contact tracing systems are already doing this, but if they aren't, then they might need to change tactics.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and BillTre
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
100
Views
9K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
287
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
516
Views
35K
Back
Top