Will a sprinter's speed keep increasing all the time?

AI Thread Summary
A sprinter's speed initially increases as they apply force to overcome friction and air drag, but this acceleration is limited by factors such as air resistance, which scales with the square of speed, and the inertia of their legs. As speed increases, the power required to maintain that speed grows cubically, meaning that doubling speed requires eight times the power. Eventually, air drag and friction will counteract the force generated by the sprinter, leading to a constant speed. While advancements in training, footwear, and running surfaces can enhance performance, there is an asymptotic limit to speed that is influenced by the sprinter's physical capabilities. The discussion highlights the complex interplay between force, speed, and environmental factors in sprinting performance.
yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
when a sprinter starts running he applies force to overcome fraction and air drag. is his speed keeps going up as F=ma governs to? if he's stamina was enough to fuel him for hours will his speed will keep going up and up even though he applies a constant force until the air drag force becomes so big that his muscles' force merely counteracts the fraction plus drag and drops to zero thus reaching constant speed?
What if hypothetically he runs in space on a surface which an artificial fraction made?
I'm aware of the limit due to reaching speed of light and mass increase. I'm not going that far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air friction roughly scales with the square of the moving object's speed, so a doubling of the runner's speed quadruples the amount of work he needs to put into maintain this speed. I'm not sure if this is the limit, though, as I don't know much about running. However I am more inclined to believe that actual sprinters are more limited by how fast they can move their legs, since the legs have quite a bit of inertia on their own.
 
I'm of the opinion that there is an asymptotic limit, but the tail could be very long. In addition to more specialized physical training and medical advances, environmental factors will increamentally help (i.e. advances in footgear, running surfaces, and clothing).
 
Nabeshin said:
Air friction roughly scales with the square of the moving object's speed, so a doubling of the runner's speed quadruples the amount of work he needs to put into maintain this speed.
But in addition, work (power, actually), is a linear function of speed even if force is held constant, so actually, the power the runner has to expend is a cube function of speed. Doubling the speed means 8x the power. Four times the force times twice the speed.
I'm not sure if this is the limit, though, as I don't know much about running. However I am more inclined to believe that actual sprinters are more limited by how fast they can move their legs, since the legs have quite a bit of inertia on their own.
Agreed.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top