Will I be capable of self-studying for AP Physics C

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of self-studying for the AP Physics C exam while concurrently taking Calculus II at a local state university. Participants explore the necessary preparation, recommend textbooks, and consider the potential benefits of attending lectures for additional support.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant emphasizes that self-assessment is crucial, stating, "Only you know what you are capable of," while affirming that self-study is doable with dedication.
  • Another participant suggests that attending lectures for first-year mechanics or E&M courses could enhance understanding, despite not being enrolled in those classes.
  • Several participants recommend textbooks, including Giancoli and Halliday & Resnick, noting that Giancoli covers more material than necessary for the AP exam but is still a viable option.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about taking both subject tests, suggesting it may be too ambitious, while others propose focusing on one test for better preparation.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of the material, with a participant advising that a solid understanding of introductory calculus is important for tackling the recommended textbooks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that self-studying for the AP Physics C exam is possible with the right resources and dedication. However, there is no consensus on whether to attempt both subject tests or focus on one, and opinions vary regarding the best textbook choice.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the limitations of available courses at the university and the potential challenges of self-studying without formal instruction. The discussion reflects varying levels of confidence in self-study capabilities and the appropriateness of different textbooks.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering self-study for AP Physics C, educators looking for textbook recommendations, and individuals interested in strategies for managing dual enrollment in high school and college courses.

mrwall-e
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I will be dually enrolled at high school and a local state university next semester. I will be taking Calculus II, and have completed a basic algebra-based Physics course.

Will I be capable of self-studying for the AP Physics C (both subjects) exam in May?

Also, can you recommend any texts for learning the material? I've looked at Halliday and Resnick as per this forum's recommendations, but before I buy it I want to make sure it covers what I need.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me start off with the obvious answer “Only you know what you are capable of”. There, with that out of the way, yes it is very doable. I don’t think you mention which of the two Physics C exams you wish to take or whether it’s both. Either way it is very doable, and i think any good textbook can PRESENT you with more than enough information or material to do well if you in fact take it seriously. With that said, if you are still looking for books, i suggest you mention which subject test you’re planning on taking because obviously those large “cover all” textbooks are much more expensive than say a book that focuses only on E&M. So yes it is something that with a certain amount of dedication you can do and good luck.
 
Also, to my understanding this isn’t illegal so i’ll suggest this. Since you say you’re taking a class in you local state college, try and see if any first year mechanics or E&M courses are being offered close to the time you are attending your calc class. If there is any, i suggest you attend lecture even though you are not enrolled, therefore you have an actual lecturer presenting the material to you. If you keep up with the class, you’ll be more than ready to pass those exams come May. It’s just an extra hour of your time, which can save you time in the long run (since imo you’re MORE LIKELY to understand the material if someone is teaching it to you, hence why most of us go to school instead of self study) Either way though, i’d say most people are capable of passing that test with a little discipline.
 
chente12 said:
Also, to my understanding this isn’t illegal so i’ll suggest this. Since you say you’re taking a class in you local state college, try and see if any first year mechanics or E&M courses are being offered close to the time you are attending your calc class. If there is any, i suggest you attend lecture even though you are not enrolled, therefore you have an actual lecturer presenting the material to you. If you keep up with the class, you’ll be more than ready to pass those exams come May. It’s just an extra hour of your time, which can save you time in the long run (since imo you’re MORE LIKELY to understand the material if someone is teaching it to you, hence why most of us go to school instead of self study) Either way though, i’d say most people are capable of passing that test with a little discipline.

Unfortunately, if there was a class available - I would take it. The university isn't very big on physics, and there isn't a class available this semester.

I was planning on taking both subject tests, but perhaps that's a little bit too much? If I were to take both, can you recommend a book that would cover all of the necessary material?

Thanks for the response.
 
I definitely could recommend a book but i’m a second year undergrad so take it with a grain of salt. The book we use at our university for physics majors is by Giancoli (4th edition). It covers much much more than needed to do well in the ap exam. For electricity and magnetism I used Giancoli and the book “fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism” by Arthur Kip. Both were good, but if people are recommending Halliday and Resnick i would probably go with that one. I’ve never read that book but i can safely say that given the good reviews and a quick look at the table of contents, that should you choose to buy that book, it will provide you with more than enough material to pass the tests. Personally i would suggest you choose one test to take, but ultimately it is up to you. Like i said, i can only go by what i know and considering i’m a second year, i know very little. Hopefully other people who are more knowledgeable in the subject (as most everyone in this forum is) can guide you toward the right direction. I just thought i would stick my finger in the subject. Even so, if you choose to go with Giancoli, you’ll be just fine. I’ve read reviews that say the book is too difficult but imo it is very fair. The problems are not very difficult but there will be some head scratchers. I suggest doing those and asking for help on this forum if you ever get stuck. There are plenty of smart people who would guide you in the correct direction. I’m also going to suggest you use MIT’s open courseware given that you won’t be taking any classes. That is the next best thing to attending lecture. Make sure though that you understand intro calc fairly well, because i’ve noticed most bad reviews of books are from people saying the math is too hard. These books being recommended are basically pure calculus so make sure you understand that.
 
chente12 said:
I definitely could recommend a book but i*m a second year undergrad so take it with a grain of salt. The book we use at our university for physics majors is by Giancoli (4th edition). It covers much much more than needed to do well in the ap exam. For electricity and magnetism I used Giancoli and the book *fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism* by Arthur Kip. Both were good, but if people are recommending Halliday and Resnick i would probably go with that one. I*ve never read that book but i can safely say that given the good reviews and a quick look at the table of contents, that should you choose to buy that book, it will provide you with more than enough material to pass the tests. Personally i would suggest you choose one test to take, but ultimately it is up to you. Like i said, i can only go by what i know and considering i*m a second year, i know very little. Hopefully other people who are more knowledgeable in the subject (as most everyone in this forum is) can guide you toward the right direction. I just thought i would stick my finger in the subject. Even so, if you choose to go with Giancoli, you*ll be just fine. I*ve read reviews that say the book is too difficult but imo it is very fair. The problems are not very difficult but there will be some head scratchers. I suggest doing those and asking for help on this forum if you ever get stuck. There are plenty of smart people who would guide you in the correct direction. I*m also going to suggest you use MIT*s open courseware given that you won*t be taking any classes. That is the next best thing to attending lecture. Make sure though that you understand intro calc fairly well, because i*ve noticed most bad reviews of books are from people saying the math is too hard. These books being recommended are basically pure calculus so make sure you understand that.

Thanks, I will definitely look into Giancoli's book. I will also look at MIT's lecture series. I think we used a Giancoli book for my algebra-based class, and I think it was okay.

Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K