News Will Newt Gingrich's 2012 Presidential Candidacy Achieve a Lunar Base?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Newt Gingrich's 2012 presidential candidacy includes an ambitious goal of establishing a manned Lunar base by 2020, which many consider overly optimistic given current economic constraints and technological challenges. Critics argue that such a project would require significant financial investment that the U.S. cannot justify, especially amid a national debt exceeding $15 trillion. There are concerns that Gingrich's proposal is more about garnering votes than practical policy, with some viewing it as reckless spending that contradicts his economic platform. The discussion highlights skepticism about the benefits of a Lunar base, suggesting that similar research could be conducted more efficiently through automated spacecraft. Overall, Gingrich's lunar ambitions may alienate voters rather than attract them, as many see them as unrealistic in the current economic climate.
  • #101
Why do people care so much about the FLOTUS anyway? She has no real power, does she?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Char. Limit said:
Why do people care so much about the FLOTUS anyway? She has no real power, does she?
Nope. No real power, legally, but a bully pulpit from which to tout her favorite causes.
 
  • #103
Char. Limit said:
Why do people care so much about the FLOTUS anyway? She has no real power, does she?

Same reason Americans were so obsessed with Princess Diana.

We may be a democracy, but we're still fascinated with royal families.
 
  • #104
Char. Limit said:
Why do people care so much about the FLOTUS anyway? She has no real power, does she?

I think some people look at the spouse to get an insight to the candidate's character.

Whether that's a fair way to judge character is debatable.
 
  • #105
lisab said:
I think some people look at the spouse to get an insight to the candidate's character.

Whether that's a fair way to judge character is debatable.

I think most people liked the character of Elizabeth Edwards, John Edward's wife.

I think most people liked the character of Lurleen Wallace, George Wallace's wife.

I think either of those examples would convince people that a candidate's spouse provides little insight into a candidate's character.

(The George Wallace example is even worse than the John Edwards example. He hid Lurleen's cancer from her so she wouldn't drop out of the race for governor, which delayed her treatment until she was beyond treatment.)
 
  • #106
George Wallace was governor for like 250 years, so obviously a lot of people felt pretty good about his character
 
  • #107
mheslep said:
(Responding to: Has Barack Obama ever filed for bankruptcy) Has he ever run a company that could go bankrupt?

You sir, are the winner of this debate.

I could not think of any other way to end it so parsimoniously.
 
  • #108
Char. Limit said:
Why do people care so much about the FLOTUS anyway? She has no real power, does she?

And how about the POPOTUS?
 
  • #109
BobG said:
I think most people liked the character of Elizabeth Edwards, John Edward's wife.

I think most people liked the character of Lurleen Wallace, George Wallace's wife.

I think either of those examples would convince people that a candidate's spouse provides little insight into a candidate's character.

(The George Wallace example is even worse than the John Edwards example. He hid Lurleen's cancer from her so she wouldn't drop out of the race for governor, which delayed her treatment until she was beyond treatment.)
great examples
 
  • #110
Gingrich has anounced he will be dropping out.

http://news.yahoo.com/gingrich-drop-republican-presidential-race-cnn-142624770.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
38
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top