Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

WIMP annihilation cross section

  1. Nov 17, 2012 #1
    Hi, I'm reading an article called SuperSymmetric Dark Matter, by G. Jungman et al. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5 and in section 3.2, he claims that
    [itex]<σv> ≈ \alpha^{2}(100 GeV)^{-2} \approx10^{-25} cm^{3} s^{-1},[\itex] for [itex]\alpha \approx \frac{1}{100}.[/itex]

    When I run through the calculation, I get 1x10[itex]^{-29}[/itex]. Have I tripped up in my calculation or am I missing an assumption somewhere?

    my calculation:
    [itex]\frac{0.01^{2}}{10^{4}GeV^{2}} = 1GeV^{-2}= 1GeV^{-2}(\hbar c)^{2}c = 3\times10^8\times4\times10^{-2}fm^{2}ms^{-1}=1\times10^{7}\times(\frac{1m}{10^{15}fm})^{2}ms^{-1}fm^{2} = 1\times10^{7}\times10^{-30}m^{3}s^{-1} = 1\times10^{-29}cm^{3}s^{-1}[/itex]

    Also he claims that his value for Ωh[itex]^2 \approx 3\times10^{-2}[/itex] is close to the value measured [itex]\approx 0.22[/itex] but it is a full order of magnitude off...

    I know that a portion of cold dark matter is in machos and in baryonic matter but that cannot account for the discrepancy between the measured value and Jungman's predicted value. Can anybody help me understand?


    Thanks, Dan
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 17, 2012 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    I see an error in your first and last "=".

    WolframAlpha gives 10-31m^3/s, which is equivalent to 10-31(102cm)^3/s = 10-25 cm^3/s.
     
  4. Nov 18, 2012 #3
    Ah, thanks. Silly mistake :<

    Any thoughts on my second question?
     
  5. Nov 18, 2012 #4

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Where is that claim?

    One order of magnitude is not so bad for a rough estimate, concerning the magnitude of some numbers involved in particle physics and cosmology.

    http://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/9506380[/size] [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  6. Nov 18, 2012 #5
    Well the phrase he uses is
    referring to [itex]<\sigma_{A}v>[/itex], the annihilation cross section.
     
  7. Nov 18, 2012 #6

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    The ftp links do not work :(, but http://theory.fnal.gov/jetp/talks/feng.pdf [Broken] (pdf) has the same remark.

    m can be tuned, so it is easy to find an m where Ωh2 ≈ 0.1. That happens to be at the scale of EWSB, but it could be a pure coincidence.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  8. Nov 18, 2012 #7
    Thanks for your help. It makes more sense now.

    Supersymmetric dark matter

    If you have access, it's worth a look ^_^

    Thanks again
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: WIMP annihilation cross section
  1. Cross section (Replies: 5)

  2. Cross Section (Replies: 7)

  3. Cross section (Replies: 2)

  4. Cross section (Replies: 7)

  5. Cross section (Replies: 0)

Loading...