Wireless Recharging: Is It Safe? | LiveScience

  • Thread starter Thread starter baywax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wireless
AI Thread Summary
Wireless recharging technology, utilizing electromagnetic induction, is being explored as a convenient method for powering devices without physical connections. Researchers emphasize that this method is safe, as energy is efficiently transferred only to matched antennas over short distances, minimizing potential harm to humans. While the technology is promising for devices like electric toothbrushes and cell phone mats, it is less efficient for larger applications, such as electric vehicles, due to practical limitations in coil size and distance. Some discussions suggest the potential for using lasers to enhance energy transfer efficiency, though this method faces challenges like conversion inefficiencies and the need for a direct line of sight. Overall, wireless recharging presents a safe and innovative solution for specific applications, though traditional plug-in methods remain more efficient for general use.
baywax
Gold Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
1
Here's an interesting development.

Could this be harmful to humans? How safe is electromagnetic induction?

New Technology Allows Wireless Recharging
By Sara Goudarzi, LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 14 November 2006 06:21 pm ET
Buzz up!
0 Comments | 0 Recommend
In the future, we might recharge electronics the same way many people now surf the web: wirelessly.

Marin Soljacic, a researcher from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, often forgets to recharge his cell phone. At times he is awakened by that last breath of electronic power that comes through as an unpleasant beep before the phone goes into sleep land itself.

“So, one night, at 3 a.m., it occurred to me: Wouldn't it be great if this thing charged itself?" Soljacic said.

The idea of wireless energy transfer is not a new one. Researchers have known that wires don’t always need to be in contact for electric power to get transferred.


http://www.livescience.com/technology/061114_wireless_recharge.html
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Very safe - the energy is only efficently transferred to a matched antennae and is very short range.
I once worked on a project to have self heating drinks where youplaced them in an inductor on the counter after buying them, it was perfectly safe to put your hand in the inductor with no chance of burnign yourself, unlike regular glass coffee jugs.
 
mgb_phys said:
Very safe - the energy is only efficently transferred to a matched antennae and is very short range.
I once worked on a project to have self heating drinks where youplaced them in an inductor on the counter after buying them, it was perfectly safe to put your hand in the inductor with no chance of burnign yourself, unlike regular glass coffee jugs.

Cool mgb_phys!

Is this something that could expand to say... recharging an electric vehicle on the move?
 
Not really ;-(
For practical efficency you ideally need the receiver to fit inside the coil. Or you need a transmitter coil bigger than the receiver and have them close together - ideally less than the coil diameter apart.

It's great for where you don't want an electrical contact, because you want something watertight sealed (electric toothbrush) or you don't want to bother with a connector (like the cell phone mat). But overall it is more efficent to use a plug if you can.
 
mgb_phys said:
Not really ;-(
For practical efficency you ideally need the receiver to fit inside the coil. Or you need a transmitter coil bigger than the receiver and have them close together - ideally less than the coil diameter apart.

It's great for where you don't want an electrical contact, because you want something watertight sealed (electric toothbrush) or you don't want to bother with a connector (like the cell phone mat). But overall it is more efficent to use a plug if you can.

In a different article covering the same idea they mention using a laser as a directional influence to concentrate the em waves toward the device, thus, reducing scattered em energy and increasing efficiency. Is this sci fi or an actual probablility?
 
To answer my own question I'll reluctantly quote Wicipedia:

LaserWith a laser beam centered on its panel of photovoltaic cells, a lightweight model plane makes the first flight of an aircraft powered by a laser beam inside a building at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center.
In the case of light, power can be transmitted by converting electricity into a laser beam that is then fired at a solar cell receiver. This is generally known as "powerbeaming". Its drawbacks are:
Conversion to light, such as with a laser, is moderately inefficient (although quantum cascade lasers improve this)
Conversion back into electricity is moderately inefficient, with photovoltaic cells achieving 40%-50% efficiency.[25] (Note that conversion efficiency is rather higher with monochromatic light than with insolation of solar panels).
Atmospheric absorption causes losses.
As with microwave beaming, this method requires a direct line of sight with the target.
NASA has demonstrated flight of a lightweight model plane powered by a laser beam.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top