- 22,820
- 14,860
See, this is what you cannot do in ”hard mode” and resulted in this death sentence:gmax137 said:info gathering
Mister T said:![]()
Last edited:
This forum discussion centers around the daily Wordle game from the New York Times, specifically Wordle 393 and 395. Participants share their results and strategies, highlighting the importance of word selection and guessing techniques. Users mention starting words like 'EARLY', 'PIOUS', and 'ADIEU' as effective openers. Additionally, the conversation touches on the game's timing, noting that Wordle updates at midnight local time, which can vary based on users' time zones.
PREREQUISITESWord enthusiasts, casual gamers, and anyone looking to improve their Wordle performance or explore similar word-based games.
See, this is what you cannot do in ”hard mode” and resulted in this death sentence:gmax137 said:info gathering
Mister T said:![]()
In the end, it is a matter of someone's specific personal risk aversion function. E.g. I value the experience of a lost attempt (damn, I could have gotten it in less) as more negative than a lost attempt by risking it.Orodruin said:See, this is what you cannot do in ”hard mode” and reaulted in this death sentence:
That’s fine. My beef with ”hard mode” is that it removes the choice. You cannot make the choice of risking it or not. In particular when you happen to make what should a priori be a good guess it can actually lock you into a situation where you cannot guarantee solving it even if you have 4 correct letters early on. That is what is absurd about the hard mode rules in my mind. Getting 4 correct on the opening guess should be a ”Great!”, not an ”oh crap!”fresh_42 said:In the end, it is a matter of someone's specific personal risk aversion function. E.g. I value the experience of a lost attempt (damn, I could have gotten it in less) as more negative than a lost attempt by risking it.
There is no one strategy fits all, since everybody has a different risk aversion function ##\mu(\sigma ).##
BLIMP would have been guaranteed to narrow it down to at most two CATCH/WATCH. All others would have been resolved.gmax137 said:BALMY which I know is wrong, but...it leaves only one of those six choices.
I don't see how it leaves one of the six choices. You have 6 words where you know the last four letters and you are looking for the first, which is different in all 6. To exclude all but one, you will have to form a valid 5-letter word using 5 of the 6 first letters in your candidate list. When they are all consonants, as in this case, it cannot be done.gmax137 said:I self-impose hard mode rules on myself, but when I get to third guess:
AUDIO
EARTH
HATCH
and think through the possibilities:
BATCH, CATCH, LATCH, MATCH, PATCH, WATCH
then i think the "hard" thing to do is narrow those down as efficiently as possible, so my fourth guess bypasses "hard mode":
BALMY which I know is wrong, but...it leaves only one of those six choices.
You're right, but in this case it left only one - because it showed "M" to be a correct letter. As @Orodruin said above, "BLIMP" would have been a better guess (ie, more informative) than my "BALMY."kuruman said:I don't see how it leaves one of the six choices.
Nope! No such luck.fresh_42 said:That's your chance to guess it in 1.
That's true, but I don't like to make a guess that I know is wrong. And hard mode prevents me from making stupid mistakes.Orodruin said:My beef with ”hard mode” is that it removes the choice. You cannot make the choice of risking it or not.
Depends on how you see it. I don’t like a rule that prevents me from making a guess that is better in terms of expected guesses to the solution.Mister T said:That's true, but I don't like to make a guess that I know is wrong.
So it should be called ”easy mode”?Mister T said:And hard mode prevents me from making stupid mistakes.
I mean, from here it took me three ”informational guesses” to rule out everything. I was certain when I wrote the last guess, but at guess 6 it is always scary thinking you might have missed something.fresh_42 said:![]()