Engineering Work and energy -- Change in KE due to a force F acting on a mass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equations of motion and work-energy principles in physics. A participant points out that the force equation provided is not relevant and highlights the correct equations, including F = ma and the work done equation. There is confusion regarding the initial velocity, which is not mentioned in the calculations. The conversation also touches on a technical issue with an image that is incorrectly oriented. Overall, the focus remains on clarifying the application of the relevant physics equations.
Max2020
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
a force of F = 3i + (6t ^ 2) j - tk acts on a particle of mass 2 kg, where F is given in newtons and t in seconds. if the initial velocity of the particle is Vo = j + 2k, in meters per second. () What is the work done by force F during the interval 0 <= t <= 2? () Using the definition of kinetic energy (K = mv ^ 2/2), find the kinetic energy variation ∆K of the particle in the same range.
Relevant Equations
F= 3i +(6t^2) j -tk
20210426_150244.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Max2020 ,
:welcome: ##\qquad !##​

Did you notice your picture is rotated by 90 degrees ? It hurts to look at it !

Your $$\vec F= 3\,\hat\imath +6t^2 \,\hat\jmath -t\,\hat k $$ is not a relevant equation: it is part of the problem statement. Fortunately I do find a relevant equation (##\vec F = m\vec a##) in your picture if I almost break my neck.

The other relevant equation is ##W = \int \vec F\cdot\vec s##, also to be found in your work.

So you try to integrate ##\vec F = m\vec a\ ## twice. But I miss the given ##v_0 = \hat \jmath + 2\,\hat k\ ## there ?

Or do you have some other question that I somehow missed ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Hello @Max2020 ,
:welcome: ##\qquad !##​

Did you notice your picture is rotated by 90 degrees ? It hurts to look at it !

Your $$\vec F= 3\,\hat\imath +6t^2 \,\hat\jmath -t\,\hat k $$ is not a relevant equation: it is part of the problem statement. Fortunately I do find a relevant equation (##\vec F = m\vec a##) in your picture if I almost break my neck.

The other relevant equation is ##W = \int \vec F\cdot\vec s##, also to be found in your work.

So you try to integrate ##\vec F = m\vec a\ ## twice. But I miss the given ##v_0 = \hat \jmath + 2\,\hat k\ ## there ?

Or do you have some other question that I somehow missed ?

##\ ##
I'm sorry for posting the photo like this. I still can't see a way to resolve this issue.
 
Max2020 said:
I'm sorry for posting the photo like this. I still can't see a way to resolve this issue.
1619481818607.png


:smile:
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K