Work and Energy of an electric motor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the work and energy involved in an electric motor pulling a 10kg crate up an inclined plane. The crate starts from rest and is raised to a height of 4.0m, with a focus on calculating the work done by the motor and the final speed of the crate after accounting for frictional heat energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of work done by the motor using the area under a force vs. distance graph and question the treatment of thermal energy produced by friction. There is discussion on the application of the work-energy principle and how to incorporate various forms of energy in the equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct application of energy equations and the relationship between work done and changes in energy. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of including heat energy in the calculations, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there may be confusion regarding the application of certain equations, as some concepts have not yet been covered in their class. Additionally, there is mention of an attachment that has not been approved, which may contain relevant information for the discussion.

Inertialforce
Messages
67
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An electric motor and a rope are used to pull a 10kg crate of car parts up an inclined plane. The crate starts out from rest on the ground and ends up with a speed of "vf" at a height of 4.0m above the ground.

The graph provided shows the force exerted on the crate by the motor as it is pulled 10m up the inclined plane.

a) How much work is done on the crate by the electric motor from d=0 to d=10?

b) 150J of heat energy is produced through friction during the 10m pull. What is the final speed of the crate at d=10m?

Homework Equations


a) Work= area under the graph
Area of a Trapezoid = (1/2)*(a+c)*(b)

b) Δ E = Heat

The Attempt at a Solution


a) Work = area under the graph
W= (1/2)*(a+c)*(b)
W= (1/2)*(50+65)*(10)
W= 575J

b)ΔE= Heat
ΔEp + ΔEk = Heat
(Epf - Epi) + (Ekf - Eki) = 150J
(Epf- 0) + (Ekf - 0) = 150J
mghf + (1/2)mvf(squared) = 150J
((10)(9.80)(4.0)) + ((1/2)(m)(vf(squared)) = 150J
392 + ((1/2)(10)(vf(squared)) = 150J

this is where I run into the problem, if I try to isolate the vf by moving the 392 to the right side to subtract from the 150J I get a negative number which I will then have to square root which is impossible. I was just wondering whether I was going in the right direction ( for both questions "a" and "b") and if I am how am I supposed to isolate the vf here so that I can get an answer when I square root it?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Inertialforce,

I can't see your attachment yet, but something does not seem right to me.

Inertialforce said:

Homework Statement


An electric motor and a rope are used to pull a 10kg crate of car parts up an inclined plane. The crate starts out from rest on the ground and ends up with a speed of "vf" at a height of 4.0m above the ground.

The graph provided shows the force exerted on the crate by the motor as it is pulled 10m up the inclined plane.

a) How much work is done on the crate by the electric motor from d=0 to d=10?

b) 150J of heat energy is produced through friction during the 10m pull. What is the final speed of the crate at d=10m?


Homework Equations


a) Work= area under the graph
Area of a Trapezoid = (1/2)*(a+c)*(b)

b) Δ E = Heat


The Attempt at a Solution


a) Work = area under the graph
W= (1/2)*(a+c)*(b)
W= (1/2)*(50+65)*(10)
W= 575J

b)ΔE= Heat
ΔEp + ΔEk = Heat

These last two equations are not correct. There are two things wrong: the work you just found in part a is not included in your equation, and also you are not quite treating the thermal energy increase correctly.

Here is the work-energy equation

[tex] W_{\rm nc} = \Delta E[/tex]
so that the work done by non-conservative forces equals the change in energy.

The frictional force does a certain amount of negative work on the crate that shows up as heat. At this point we have a choice in how we view the problem. We can either track the work done by the frictional force or the increase in thermal energy. In this case, you are tracking the heat energy, so the +150J needs to be on the energy side of the equation.

(If instead of the heat, you were tracking the frictional work, it would -150J on the work side of the equation. So mathematically there is no difference.)
 
alphysicist said:
Hi Inertialforce,

I can't see your attachment yet, but something does not seem right to me.



These last two equations are not correct. There are two things wrong: the work you just found in part a is not included in your equation, and also you are not quite treating the thermal energy increase correctly.

Here is the work-energy equation

[tex] W_{\rm nc} = \Delta E[/tex]
so that the work done by non-conservative forces equals the change in energy.

The frictional force does a certain amount of negative work on the crate that shows up as heat. At this point we have a choice in how we view the problem. We can either track the work done by the frictional force or the increase in thermal energy. In this case, you are tracking the heat energy, so the +150J needs to be on the energy side of the equation.

(If instead of the heat, you were tracking the frictional work, it would -150J on the work side of the equation. So mathematically there is no difference.)

Would this be more accurate (or correct)?:

Wnc = ΔE
Wnc = (Epf-Epi) + (Ekf-Eki) + heat
575 = (Epf) + (Ekf) + heat
575 = (mghf) + ((1/2)mvf(squared)) + 150
575 - 150 = (10)(9.80)(4.0) + (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
425 = 392 + (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
425 - 392 = (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
(33)(2) = (10)(vf(squared))
66/10 = vf(squared)
√6.6 = √vf(squared)
2.569046516 = vf
2.6 m/s = vf

Sorry but could you check and tell me if this is correct or if I am doing it correctly now, because our class has never (or hasn't yet) learned this equation (Wnc = ΔE) so I am unsure as to how to utilize the formula.
 
Inertialforce said:
Would this be more accurate (or correct)?:

Wnc = ΔE
Wnc = (Epf-Epi) + (Ekf-Eki) + heat
575 = (Epf) + (Ekf) + heat
575 = (mghf) + ((1/2)mvf(squared)) + 150
575 - 150 = (10)(9.80)(4.0) + (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
425 = 392 + (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
425 - 392 = (1/2)(10)(vf(squared))
(33)(2) = (10)(vf(squared))
66/10 = vf(squared)
√6.6 = √vf(squared)
2.569046516 = vf
2.6 m/s = vf

Sorry but could you check and tell me if this is correct or if I am doing it correctly now, because our class has never (or hasn't yet) learned this equation (Wnc = ΔE) so I am unsure as to how to utilize the formula.

The form of the equation looks right to me now; however I can't yet say everything is correct until the attachment in your original post is approved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K