Work and kinetic friction coefficient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block sliding down a frictionless hill and then coming to a stop on a rough pavement due to kinetic friction. The height of the hill and the initial speed of the block are provided, along with the distance over which it stops. The main focus is on determining the coefficient of kinetic friction and the average acceleration of the block.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of mass in the calculations and question how to incorporate the height of the hill into the energy equations. Some suggest starting with the conservation of energy to find the speed at the bottom of the hill before addressing friction.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between energy at the top and bottom of the hill, with some participants successfully calculating the speed at the bottom. Guidance has been provided regarding the use of energy conservation principles, but there remains some confusion about the average acceleration and the correct application of formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential missing information, such as the angle of the hill, which could affect calculations. There is also a recognition that the problem involves multiple steps, requiring careful consideration of both the descent and the subsequent motion on the rough surface.

DoctorB2B
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block slides down a frictionless hill, h=1.8m high. At the top of the hill the block has a speed of v=2.8m/s. At the bottom of the hill, the block travels over a patch of rough pavement and comes to a complete stop after s=5.0m distance due to friction.

a) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the pavement and the block at the bottom of the hill?

b) What is the magnitude of the averge acceleration of the block while traveling over the rough patch?

Homework Equations


Fk=ukmg
Wf=ukmg x s
Work energy theorem: W=0.5mv22-0.5mv12

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems that something is missing from this equation. Isn't mass a necessity here? Also, I'm not sure where to factor in the height of the hill into this equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First try to calculate the block's speed at the bottom of the hill.

Hint: the mass of the block is irrelevant - it will cancel out. Try it and see what happens.
 
Last edited:
Conservation of energy

DoctorB2B said:
A block slides down a frictionless hill, h=1.8m high. At the top of the hill the block has a speed of v=2.8m/s.
The first step is to calculate the block's total energy at the top of the hill. The hill is frictionless, so the block's energy is conserved as it slides down the hill. That means you can calculate the block's speed when it reaches the bottom of the hill.
At the bottom of the hill, the block travels over a patch of rough pavement
Isn't mass a necessity here?
Don't worry about that yet. Just start working on the problem and see what happens.
 
Okay, I think I've gotten the kinetic friction coefficient by using the formula s=v2/uk2g which gave me 0.08.


I am however a tad lost when it comes to determining average acceleration.
 
I approached this problem differently than you - I found the average acceleration first.

But anyway, you're using that formula incorrectly, because that's from your speed at the TOP of the hill.

You need the speed at the bottom. Then you will be able to use your formula.
 
then I'm lost ... because it seems like there are variables missing. If I'm to solve for average acceleration, don't I need an angle so I can determine the length of the hill?
 
first the hill, then friction

You can't solve this problem in one step. There are two parts to it: accelerating down the hill, and then slowing down at the bottom. You need to find the block's speed when it reaches the bottom of the hill before you can analyze what happens to it in the rough patch.
 
Sorry, I think I confused you. Forget about the average acceleration for a minute.

Let's first just worry about the speed at the bottom of the hill. You do this using conservation of energy calculations.

Remember, total initial energy = total final energy.

What kinds of energy does the block have at the top of the hill?

What does it have at the bottom?
 
At the top of the hill, the block has kinetic energy and at the bottom it has potential energy due to lack of movement.
 
  • #10
No, not quite.

Whenever something is in motion (aka whenever it has a speed) it has kinetic energy.

Whenever something has height, it has gravitational potential energy.

At the top of the hill, does the block have motion? Yes, so it has kinetic energy. Does it have height? Yes, it is 1.8 m in the air. So, it has gravitational potential energy.

At the bottom of the hill, the block still has movement! It doesn't just stop when it gets to the bottom - it continues moving for 5 seconds, right? So it has kinetic energy.

But - the block has no height anymore! If it has zero height, it has zero potential energy.

How can you put this information into a formula?
 
  • #11
k ... so it goes a little something like this then: K1 + Ugrav = K2.

The mass cancels on both sides leaving (0.5vi2+gh)=0.5vf2 where the velocity at the bottom of the hill is 6.57m/s.
 
  • #12
Yes, that's right!

(Be careful, though - what you have at the bottom of the hill is a speed, not a velocity).

Now, you can use that formula you had before to find the coefficient of kinetic friction.

You can find acceleration, too, because you know the block starts with a speed of 6.57 m/s, travels 5.0 m, and ends with a speed of 0 m/s.
 
  • #13
coefficient = 0.44

average acc. = (6.57m/s-0m/s)/0.76s = 8.64m/s2
 
  • #14
0.44 is correct, but your acceleration isn't. Double check that time you found.
 
  • #15
am I using 6.57 and 0 as v1 and v2 respectively?
 
  • #16
Yes.
 
  • #17
Thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
13K