Work Calculations: Lift Object w/ Force > Weight?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hydrogen1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations of work done when lifting an object, particularly when comparing lifting with a force equal to the object's weight versus using a greater force that accelerates the object. Participants explore the implications of these different lifting scenarios on work and energy, including gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that lifting an object with a force equal to its weight results in work that is not dependent on the path taken, as it is determined solely by the change in gravitational potential energy.
  • Another participant suggests that if the object is accelerated, the work done would also account for the kinetic energy gained, indicating that more work is done when lifting with a force greater than the weight.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that work is calculated as the product of force and distance, implying that using a greater force results in more work done.
  • Some participants acknowledge that the work done on the object includes contributions to both potential and kinetic energy, depending on the speed of lifting.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the relationship between work, energy changes, and the speed of lifting, with some participants adjusting their understanding based on these discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the work done is solely related to potential energy or if it also includes kinetic energy contributions. There is no consensus on the implications of lifting with different forces, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between force, work, and energy changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nuances of work calculations, including assumptions about the object's state at different points and the definitions of energy types involved. Some mathematical steps and definitions remain unresolved.

hydrogen1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I understand that if you lift an object a short distance in the air that it takes work because you are moving against the the weight of the object through a distance. So the equation in my mind is W=mgdcos[tex]\Theta[/tex] where [tex]\Theta[/tex]=0. But what I can't figure out is what if I lift the object with a force that accelerates the object F>Weight. If I lift an object with a force equal to it's weight is the work different than if I accelerate the object to the same height? I hope this makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hydrogen1 said:
If I lift an object with a force equal to it's weight is the work different than if I accelerate the object to the same height?

No, because the work is not dependent on the path the object took. The work (in this case) is only given by the change in gravitational potential energy of the lifted object, and the potential energy is only due to the position of the object, not how fast it's moving at that position.

Now, if you want to talk about the work your muscles expended during the lifting, that's most likely different depending on the speed of lifting. Most likely, a machine could also consume different amounts of power depending on the rate of lifting.
 
Wouldn't I be putting in the work to change potential energy and giving the object kinetic energy too? I do understand that the potential energy is a state function
 
I think I understand your question a little better. Work = Force*distance, and if you vary the force (i.e. the object's acceleration), you can vary the work done on the object. Some of that work will be used to change the potential energy, and the rest goes to kinetic energy.
 
Andy Resnick said:
No, because the work is not dependent on the path the object took. The work (in this case) is only given by the change in gravitational potential energy of the lifted object, and the potential energy is only due to the position of the object, not how fast it's moving at that position.
Totally not so. The work is given by the change in total energy. That means potential energy change, but also kinetic energy change. If the object has more speed at the end of the exercise, then you did more work, even if it is at the same height so far. This additional speed means that eventually the object will continue moving up and reach higher height on its own.

Work is directly multiplication of the magnitude of the force by the distance traveled in the same direction as the force. So obviously lifting it with more force does more work.
 
Ok, thanks this is now clear to me. The force applied - the weight of the object goes to kinetic energy
 
georgir said:
Totally not so. The work is given by the change in total energy. That means potential energy change, but also kinetic energy change. If the object has more speed at the end of the exercise, then you did more work, even if it is at the same height so far. This additional speed means that eventually the object will continue moving up and reach higher height on its own.

Work is directly multiplication of the magnitude of the force by the distance traveled in the same direction as the force. So obviously lifting it with more force does more work.

I had originally thought the OP meant the object is at rest at the two endpoints. When the OP clarified, my answer was adjusted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
12K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K