Calculating Parachute Work and Distance for Slowing Down a Car

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a parachute to decelerate a car, utilizing the equations W = F_{d} * d and F_{d} = C_{d} ρ A_{f} V^{2}/2. The participants debate the relationship between the distance required to slow down a car and its initial velocity, concluding that the distance is not independent of velocity. The integral equations presented, ∫C_{d} ρ A_{f} V dV * d = ∫m V dV, illustrate the complexity of the changing forces during deceleration, emphasizing that the work done cannot be simplified to a constant force scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with drag force calculations, specifically C_{d} and A_{f}
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for solving differential equations
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy and work-energy theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the drag force equation F_{d} = C_{d} ρ A_{f} V^{2}/2
  • Study the integration techniques for solving differential equations in physics
  • Investigate the effects of varying initial velocities on stopping distances in automotive physics
  • Learn about the work-energy principle and its applications in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of deceleration and the application of drag forces in vehicle safety mechanisms.

billy_jack
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i'm trying to figure out the work done by a parachute to slow down a car and so far i have come up with:

W = F_{d} * d
F_{d} = C_{d} ρ A_{f} V^{2}/2

and i have equated the loss of kinetic energy to the work done by the parachute, since the velocity is not constant and therefore the work and kinetic energy are not constant i end up with the following:

∫C_{d} ρ A_{f} V dV * d = ∫m V dV

does this mean that the distance to slow down the car from one velocity to another is independent of velocity? surely the distance to go from 1000mph to 100mph is not the same as the distance to go from 200mph to 100mph

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

billy_jack said:
i'm trying to figure out the work done by a parachute to slow down a car and so far i have come up with:

W = F_{d} * d
F_{d} = C_{d} ρ A_{f} V^{2}/2

and i have equated the loss of kinetic energy to the work done by the parachute,...
Equating W with the change in kinetic energy should be enough, shouldn't it? Just plug in the mass and initial velocity of the car to get the initial kinetic energy, and that is equal to the work done to stop the car.
... since the velocity is not constant and therefore the work and kinetic energy are not constant i end up with the following:

∫C_{d} ρ A_{f} V dV * d = ∫m V dV
I disagree with the left-hand side of this equation. The right-hand side is the integral of m·a·dx=F·dx, so that's the work done. The left-hand side is (the integral of dF)*d, so that's the change in force ΔF, times the distance traveled d. And since the force is zero once the car has stopped, that integral is equivalent to the initial drag force on the car. So you have basically said
(Initial force)·d = work done,​
which is not true, since the force is continually changing as the car slows down.
does this mean that the distance to slow down the car from one velocity to another is independent of velocity? surely the distance to go from 1000mph to 100mph is not the same as the distance to go from 200mph to 100mph

thanks in advance
 
billy_jack said:
F_{d} = C_{d} ρ A_{f} V^{2}/2

Fd is a function of velocity. Acceleraion = f/m so you can change this to

a = dv/dt = - c v2.

where c is all of those constants combined.

To solve this for velocity versus time via direct integration (don't forget to add a constant term for initial velocity at t=0 after integrating):

dv/dt = - c v2.

dv/(- c v2) = dt

Then you can integrate that equation to solve for distance versus time, using the same method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
402
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
674