Work done by action reaction forces when they move things

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Let'sthink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    action Forces Reaction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of action-reaction forces in the context of a mass sliding down an inclined plane and the associated normal force. Participants clarify that while action-reaction forces typically do not perform work on the same object, they can influence motion when considering multiple bodies. The normal force, denoted as N, and the gravitational force component mg cos θ are crucial in analyzing the system's dynamics. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between constraint forces and interaction forces, particularly in relation to Newton's laws of motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion, particularly the Second and Third Laws.
  • Familiarity with forces acting on inclined planes, including gravitational and normal forces.
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and dynamics in physics.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations involving forces and motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the normal force (N) in inclined plane problems.
  • Study the implications of constraint forces in multi-body systems.
  • Learn about the work-energy principle in the context of action-reaction forces.
  • Investigate the differences between contact forces and distant forces in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in classical mechanics, particularly those studying forces and motion in multi-body systems.

Let'sthink
Messages
355
Reaction score
82
TL;DR
A point mass m slides down the smooth surface (of length L) inclined at an angle θ) of wedge of mass M kept on a smooth horizontal plane. The height of the wedge is H and base B. Discuss their motion and find time when they separate and their velocities when they separate.
This is not homework.
Normally action reaction forces do not move things. In this problem they move. I wish to discuss in what way these so called constrain forces contributeto motion or kinetic energy L. Do they do wirk. Yes then why no then why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a wider view of action-reaction, a mass is pulled by the Earth. The Earth is pulled by a mass with same amount of force.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Please first state what kind of motion do you expect for block of mass m and Incline of Mass M. Will reaction force be mg cos theta or will it be different?
 
Let'sthink said:
Will reaction force be mg cos theta or will it be different?
The gravity force normal to the slope is mg cos theta. It cancells with force from slope.
 
Last edited:
Let'sthink said:
Will reaction force be mg cos theta or will it be different?
By reaction force you mean normal force of contact between the point mass ##m## and the incline of mass##M##. Try writing Newtons 2nd Law for each free body. Once you have them you can investigate whether or not what you are asking holds.

Please see LaTeX Guide for formatting mathematics
 
Let'sthink said:
Normally action reaction forces do not move things.
They can move because action force is applied to A from B and reaction force is to B from A. They are not cancelling forces applied to the same mass.
 
Last edited:
Let'sthink said:
Normally action reaction forces do not move things.
What do you mean here? All interaction forces obey Newton's 3rd Law (if that's what you mean by "action reaction forces"). The acceleration depends on the total force on each object (Newton's 2nd Law).
 
What is fundamental difference between forces of interaction between objects even from a distance and so called action reaction forces of constraint between two bodies in contact or constrained to be in contact?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
B
What is the magnitude of reaction force still mg cos theta or different?
 
  • #10
erobz said:
By reaction force you mean normal force of contact between the point mass ##m## and the incline of mass##M##. Try writing Newtons 2nd Law for each free body. Once you have them you can investigate whether or not what you are asking holds.

Please see LaTeX Guide for formatting mathematics
This is not my homework. I have already derived the expression. I am posting for the purpose of stimulating discussion to bring out fundamental difference difference between forces of constraint and forces of interaction which can be expression terms of distance between them.
 
  • #11
Let'sthink said:
What is the magnitude of reaction force still mg cos theta or different?

Say A is the mass and B is the Earth including the slope.
Force from B to A is ##m\mathbf{g} + \mathbf{N}##
Force from A to B is ##-m\mathbf{g} - \mathbf{N}##
where N is force transmitted from B to A at slope plane. These coupled forces satisfing
F(B\rightarrow A) =- F(A \rightarrow B) are called action and reaction.

The constraint that the mass stays on the slope is realized by the balance of N and mg ##\cos \theta##, the normal-to-slope component of ##m \mathbf{g}##. Mass does not move in noral direction of the slope if initially it is on the slope. Please be careful that N and mg ##\cos \theta## which are applying on the SAME body, are not action and reaction which are applying to DIFFERENT bodies in interaction, e.g., A and B in the above example.

BTW Why don‘t you apply y=##\tan \theta## x, where x and y are the coordinates of the mass, for the constraint condition of your problem ?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Let'sthink said:
What is fundamental difference between forces of interaction between objects even from a distance and so called action reaction forces of constraint between two bodies in contact or constrained to be in contact?
Newton's 3rd Law (usually associated with "action and reaction") applies to all interaction forces (contact and distant).

Constraint forces are a subset of interaction forces. They usually act to constrain the relative kinematics between two bodies. They do this by automatically adjusting themselves, based on other forces acting simultaneously on those bodies, to make the net force consistent with certain kinematics (Newton's 2nd Law). Some people might call that also "action and reaction", but it is a completely different meaning than above.

In either case, the action-reaction-terminology adds nothing to the actual physics, so I would advice to avoid it completely.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and Lnewqban
  • #13
Let'sthink said:
TL;DR Summary: A point mass m slides down the smooth surface (of length L) inclined at an angle θ) of wedge of mass M kept on a smooth horizontal plane. The height of the wedge is H and base B. Discuss their motion and find time when they separate and their velocities when they separate.
This is not homework.

In this problem they move.
I have a feeling that you have the old 'classification problem'. I think you are conflating action and reaction with equilibrium and see a contradiction. N3 always applies; N2 deals with different pairs of forces.

Third Law pairs are involved in motion and each 'does work' in many situations. The only time they don't is when the net value of all the forces is zero. But the magnitude of an action force is always the same as the magnitude of the reaction force; that net force is zero. In your Summary you must use all the correct forces to decide whether or not work has been done.
Edit.... And, to state the obvious, the work done 'by' one of those forces is equal and opposite sign to the work done 'by' the other one. In cases where there is internal movement (e.g. stretch on a string or squashing of a coupling) the actual motion may be different and that will involve loss of energy
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Let'sthink said:
This is not my homework. I have already derived the expression.
Just clarify, and discussion can begin? I'm pretty sure most of us like to go into the equations to get/examine necessary insights (at least I do).


Let'sthink said:
What is the magnitude of reaction force still mg cos theta or different?
If you are not sure about this, then you seemingly have the expression wrong. Why don't you just post the expression and derivation for ##N## (the normal contact force from the (accelerating) slope acting on the point mass)? My opinion is that it is definitely not that expression in general for this problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K