.Work Done by an Ideal Gas - Derivation and Implications

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work done by an ideal gas, particularly focusing on the implications of positive and negative work in thermodynamic processes. Participants explore the mathematical expression for work, its interpretation in different scenarios, and the relationship between work done by the gas and work done on the gas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the expression for work done by an ideal gas, \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV, can yield negative values when the final volume is less than the initial volume, leading to questions about the interpretation of work in such cases.
  • Others argue that negative work indicates that work is done on the gas, while positive work indicates work done by the gas, with the relationship W_{on gas} = -W_{by gas} being highlighted as a consequence of Newton's third law.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the definitions of positive and negative work, suggesting that the conventional understanding may not adequately capture the nuances of thermodynamic processes.
  • Some participants clarify that when work is done on the gas, it can lead to an increase in temperature, although this is not universally agreed upon, as another participant notes that energy can also be lost as heat.
  • There is a discussion about the first law of thermodynamics and its implications for energy transfer, emphasizing the reciprocal nature of energy changes between the system and the environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of negative work and the relationship between work done by and on the gas. There are competing views on how to interpret these concepts, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of definitions and their implications in thermodynamics.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include the dependence on specific definitions of work and energy transfer, as well as the potential for confusion arising from the one-way versus reciprocal nature of work in thermodynamic systems.

jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
The expression for the work done by an ideal gas is:

[tex]\int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV[/tex]

But what if [tex]V_f \prec V_i[/tex]? If [tex]W \prec 0[/tex] does that mean

1) work is done on the gas or

2)on this case, [tex]W= - \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV[/tex] so that [tex]W \succ 0[/tex] and W still means the work done by the gas?

Note: The question may seem obvious but the derivation of the above expression only makes sense for work done by the gas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the volume decreases, then the gas does negative work on the environment, which also means that the environment does positive work on the gas.

[tex] \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV [/tex]
is always the work done by the gas (but it can be a positive or negative value). Also:
[tex] W_{on gas} = -W_{by gas}[/tex]
which is a direct result of Newton's third law.
 
JaWiB,

I think I got it. According to what you said, when we say, in thermodynamics, that work is done by the system only when

[tex]W \succ 0[/tex]

this is not true. Positive work done by the system is when [tex]W \succ 0[/tex] and negative work done by the system is when [tex]W \prec 0[/tex].

Somehow, this a bit more confusing than the previous formulation: [tex]W \succ 0[/tex] - work by the system; [tex]W \prec 0[/tex] work on the system.

Any thoughts on how to make it clearer?
 
jpas said:
what if [tex]V_f \prec V_i[/tex]? If [tex]W \prec 0[/tex] does that mean

1) work is done on the gas

Yes. Some external agent must do work in order to decrease the volume. The agent does work on the gas during this process. By the way, the work done by the agent is ultimately manifest as an increase in gas temperature.
 
jpas said:
Any thoughts on how to make it clearer?

The first law of thermodynamics: [tex]{\Delta}U = Q - W[/tex]
when W is the work done by the system. If W is positive, and no heat is transferred to the system, then it loses energy (and this is often manifest as a decrease in temperature).

The way you're thinking about it might be problematic because it is tempting to think of work as a one-way process: either the work done by the system is positive and the environment gains energy or the work done on the system is positive and the system gains energy. In reality, if the system gains energy the environment loses energy, and if the environment gains energy then the system loses energy.
 
By the way, the work done by the agent is ultimately manifest as an increase in gas temperature.
Not necessarily. The gas can also lose energy on the form of heat such that Q=W.


JaWiB,

Good explanation. Though at first it seemed confusing, I think I got it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K