How Much Energy Does a Dieter Use by Lifting Weights?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Puneet Tanwar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight Work Work done
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A dieter lifting a 10 kg mass one thousand times to a height of 0.5 m performs positive work against gravitational force, calculated using the formula for gravitational potential energy. The total work done is 5000 Joules. Given that fat supplies 3.8 × 107 J/kg and the conversion efficiency is 20%, the dieter will utilize approximately 0.66 kg of fat for this activity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ignoring negative work done by gravity when lowering the weight, as the potential energy lost is considered dissipated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic knowledge of work-energy principles
  • Familiarity with energy conversion efficiency concepts
  • Knowledge of mass and weight relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore detailed calculations of gravitational potential energy using different masses and heights
  • Learn about energy efficiency in human biomechanics and exercise
  • Investigate methods for energy recovery in mechanical systems, such as regenerative braking
  • Research the physiological effects of fat metabolism during exercise
USEFUL FOR

Fitness enthusiasts, exercise physiologists, and anyone interested in understanding the energy expenditure associated with weightlifting and fat metabolism.

Puneet Tanwar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi -

Question: A person trying to lose weight (dieter) lifts a 10 kg mass, one thousand times, to a
height of 0.5 m each time. Assume that the potential energy lost each time she
lowers the mass is dissipated. (a) How much work does she do against the gravitational
force ? (b) Fat supplies 3.8 × 107J of energy per kilogram which is converted to
mechanical energy with a 20% efficiency rate. How much fat will the dieter use up?

What is the significance of the following line in this question?
"Assume that the potential energy lost each time she lowers the mass is dissipated."

Thanks
Puneet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Puneet Tanwar said:
What is the significance of the following line in this question?
"Assume that the potential energy lost each time she lowers the mass is dissipated."
It means to ignore the work done by gravity as the weight is lowered. Just count the positive work she does as she lifts the weight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Puneet Tanwar
Doc Al said:
It means to ignore the work done by gravity as the weight is lowered. Just count the positive work she does as she lifts the weight.

Is this the right way of looking at it: since the loss of PE is dissipated, she does not have to do any negative work against gravity on the way down?
 
Puneet Tanwar said:
Is this the right way of looking at it: since the loss of PE is dissipated, she does not have to do any negative work against gravity on the way down?
Yes, just ignore the negative work done when the weight is lowered.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Puneet Tanwar
Puneet Tanwar said:
Is this the right way of looking at it: since the loss of PE is dissipated, she does not have to do any negative work against gravity on the way down?
I agree with @Doc Al that that's intended interpretation of the question, but a couple of other ways to look at it since you seem to be trying to connect this to reality:

1. If a machine like an elevator were doing this work, it might be equipped with a way to recover that energy by charging a battery as it lowers the weight.
2. Humans are very inefficient machines and use energy to generate a force, even when moving backwards. So in reality you actually are still expending energy even when lowering the weight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Doc Al and Puneet Tanwar

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
10K